CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 319Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesGamma-ray bursts and supernovaeGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stellar Models and Yields of Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars

Open access
Karakas, Amanda, Lattanzio, John C.·2007·Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
DOI 10.1071/as07021
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

We present stellar yields calculated from detailed models of low and intermediate-mass asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. We evolve models with a range of mass from 1 to 6 M⊙, and initial metallicities from solar to 1/200th of the solar metallicity. Each model was evolved from the zero age main sequence to near the end of the thermally pulsing (TP) AGB phase, and through all intermediate phases including the core He-flash for stars initially less massive than 2.5 M⊙. For each mass and metallicity, we provide tables containing structural details of the stellar models during the TP-AGB phase, and tables of the stellar yields for 74 species from hydrogen through to sulfur, and for a small number of iron-group nuclei. All tables are available for download. Our results have many applications including use in population synthesis studies and the chemical evolution of galaxies and stellar systems, and for comparison to the composition of AGB and post-AGB stars and planetary nebulae.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1071/as07021

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first stellar yields for a large range of masses and metallicities from detailed AGB models were published by Karakas & Lattanzio (2007), with an update by Karakas (2010).

    “The first stellar yields for a large range of masses, and metallicities from detailed AGB models were published by Karakas & Lattanzio (2007), with an update by Karakas (2010).”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas & Lattanzio 2007

  • During HBB, temperatures at the base of the convective envelope reach T_bce ≳ 100 MK in the lowest metallicity, massive AGB stars.

    “During HBB the temperatures at the base of the convective envelope are higher than in the H shell during the first ascent of the giant branch, reaching T bce ≳ 100 MK in the lowest metallicity, massive AGB stars”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas & Lattanzio 2007

  • Canonical AGB models do not produce substantial quantities of elemental O and stellar yields from such models are generally negligible, except at the lowest metallicities.

    “Canonical AGB models do not produce substantial quantities of elemental O and stellar yields from such models are generally negligible, except at the lowest metallicities (e.g., at Z ≤ 10 -4 Karakas & Lattanzio 2007; Campbell & Lattanzio 2008; Karakas 2010; Cristallo et al. 2011).”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas & Lattanzio 2007

  • The stellar models in Karakas (2010) produced between ∼6 to 30 times less Na compared to the stellar models in Karakas & Lattanzio (2007) as a result of using updated reaction rates.

    “The stellar models in Karakas (2010) produced between ∼ 6 to 30 times less Na compared to the stellar models in Karakas & Lattanzio (2007) as a result of using updated reaction rates.”

    From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Karakas & Lattanzio (2007)

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. Stancliffe, 2004, MmSAI, 75, 670
  2. Siess, 2006, AandA, 448, 717
  3. Marigo, 2001, AandA, 370, 194
  4. Izzard, 2006, AandA, 460, 565
  5. Karakas A. I. , 2003, PhD thesis, Monash University
  6. Thielemann, 1986, Advances in Nuclear Astrophysics, 525
  7. Campbell S. W. , 2007, PhD thesis, Monash University
  8. Frost, 1998, AandA, 332, L17
  9. Forestini, 1997, AandAS, 123, 241
  10. Wagenhuber, 1998, AandA, 340, 183
  11. Ventura, 2005, AandA, 431, 279
  12. Asplund, 2005, in ASPC 336: Cosmic Abundances as Records of Stellar Evolution and Nucleo-synthesis, 25
  13. Lugaro, 2007, AandA, 461, 657
  14. Ventura, 2002, AandA, 393, 215
  15. Palacios, 2006, AandA, 453, 261
  16. Ventura, 2005, AandA, 439, 1075
  17. Izzard, 2007, AandA, 466, 641
  18. Blöcker, 1991, AandA, 244, L43
  19. Groenewegen, 1993, AandA, 267, 410
  20. Lattanzio, 1996, MmSAI, 67, 729
  21. Marigo, 1996, AandA, 313, 545
  22. Goriely, 2000, AandA, 362, 599
  23. Garcia-Hernandez, 2007, AandA, 462, 711
  24. Renzini, 1981, AandA, 94, 175
  25. McSaveney J. A. , Wood P. R. , Scholz M. , Lattanzio J. C. & Hinkle K. H. , 2007, MNRAS, in press
  26. Jorissen, 1992, AandA, 261, 164
  27. van den Hoek, 1997, AandAS, 123, 305
  28. Charbonnel, 1994, AandA, 282, 811
  29. Mowlavi, 1999, AandA, 344, 617
  30. Guandalini, 2006, AandA, 445, 1069
  31. Blöcker, 1995, AandA, 297, 727
  32. Sterling N. C. & Dinerstein H. L. , 2007, ApJS, in press
  33. Yong, 2003, AandA, 402, 985
  34. Charbonnel, 2007, AandA, 467, L15

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Karakas, A., & Lattanzio, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Mount Stromlo Observatory (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Karakas, Amanda
Venue
Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Published
2007
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
103-117
ISSN
  • 1323-3580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1448-6083
DOI
10.1071/as07021
OpenAlex
W2097122825
Cited by
312
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 23 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
17.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
www.cambridge.org/core/terms (unspecified, 2255 d)
Locations
  • Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP0664105)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
asymptotic giant branch stars, stellar yields, thermally pulsing AGB, stellar nucleosynthesis, low- and intermediate-mass stars, metallicity dependence, core helium flash, stellar structure, population synthesis, chemical evolution, planetary nebulae, post-AGB stars

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review