The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Carbon isotope ratios and lithium abundances in open cluster giants
Abstract
New high-resolution, high S/N spectra of CN lines at 8000 A and Li lines at 6707 A have been obtained for giants in about 20 Galactic open clusters and C-12/C-13 ratios and Li abundances determined for these stars. The ages of the clusters vary from about 50 million years to 5 billion years, and their turn-off masses vary from 1 solar mass to about 6 solar masses. The ages and turn-off masses were determined by fitting theoretical isochrones to the cluster color-magnitude diagrams. Correlation of the isotope ratio and the Li abundances with the cluster turn-off masses indicates the following: (1) the C-12/C-13 ratio increases steeply with the turn-off mass until a mass of approximately 2.2 solar masses when the ratio levels off abruptly to a value near 26; (2) older clusters with turn-off masses lower than about 2.2 solar masses in general exhibit C-12/C-13 ratios that are considerably lower than the theoretically predicted values while those with larger turn-off masses show ratios close to standard predictions; and (3) no strong correlation exists between the Li abundances and the cluster turn-off mass, and the Li abundances in giants are, in general, lower than theoretically predicted values. Various theories to explain the observed abundance trends are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observations of the 12C/13C ratio in open metal-rich clusters reveal values of ≲20, sometimes ≲10, well below the predicted values of ≈25-30.
“observations of the 12 C/ 13 C ratio in open metal-rich clusters reveal values of ≲ 20, sometimes ≲ 10(e.g., Gilroy 1989; Smiljanic et al. 2009; Mikolaitis et al. 2010) well below the predicted values of ≈ 25 -30.”
From The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars (2014) · cites this paper as Gilroy 1989
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Dawes Review 2: Nucleosynthesis and Stellar Yields of Low- and Intermediate-Mass Single Stars
Karakas, A. I., & Lattanzio, J. C. (2014) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1017/pasa.2014.21 · Cited by 735
“10 (e.g., Gilroy 1989; Smiljanic et al. 2009; Mikolaitis et al. 2010) well below the predicted values of ≈ 25− 30.”
BackgroundNucleosynthesis of Light-Element Isotopes in Evolved Stars Experiencing Extended Mixing
Palmerini, S., Busso, M., Maiorca, E., & Guandalini, R. (2009) · Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia · doi:10.1071/as08040 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Gilroy, K. K.
- Corresponding author
- Gilroy, Kalpana Krishnaswamy
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 347
- Pages
- 835
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2059671793
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 5.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Keywords
- carbon isotope ratio, lithium abundance, cluster age, isochrone fitting, color-magnitude diagram, stellar nucleosynthesis, Galactic open clusters
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review