The DOI matches its Crossref record.
On the orbital period change of the binary pulsar PSR 1913 + 16
Abstract
We reexamine the theoretical significance of the raw observational parameter called the "rate of orbital period change," Pṡobs, of the binary pulsar PSR 1913+16. We show that the current precision (∼0.8%) on the determination of Pṡobs makes it necessary to take explicitly into account the effects of the galactic accelerations of the pulsar and the Sun, and that of the proper motion of the pulsar. Several other possible contributions to Pṡobs are (re)examined and found negligible. As the value of the galactic contribution to Pṡb/Pb depends explicitly on the distance to the pulsar, say d, we have been led to reexamine the determination of d from dispersion measurements. We find that recent progress in H I absorption measurements in the first galactic longitude quadrant allows one to constrain the mean electron density along the line of sight to PSR 1913+ 16 (1 = 50°) to the range ne(50°) = ([6.39±0.93] [R0/1 kpc])-1 cm-3, where R0 is the galactocentric distance of the Sun. This value for ne is smaller than the "standard" one and leads to a galactic-reduced distance to PSR 1913+16, d/R0= 1.08±0.16. After subtraction of the galactic effects, the latest experimental results yield a 0.8 % confirmation of the general relativistic prediction:Pṡobs-gal/b / PṡGR/b = - 1.0081±0.0022(galactic) ±0.0076(observational). Alternatively, this result yields an upper bound to the rate of change of Newton's gravitational constant, Gṡ/G = (1.10±1.07) × 10-11 yr-1, which, in the long term, may be limited to the ±3 × 10-12 yr-1 level of precision because of the uncertainties in the values of the galactic constants, R0 and υ0.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2014) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-4 · Cited by 3,996
The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment
Will, C. M. (2006) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.12942/lrr-2006-3 · Cited by 1,606
Reid, M. J., Menten, K. M., Brunthaler, A., Zheng, X. W., Dame, T. M., Xu, Y., Wu, Y., Zhang, B., Sanna, A., Sato, M., et al. (2014) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/130 · Cited by 1,379
The fundamental constants and their variation: observational and theoretical status
Uzan, J.-P. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.403 · Cited by 1,162
Tensor-multi-scalar theories of gravitation
Damour, T., & Esposito-Farese, G. (1992) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/9/9/015 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Damour, T., & Taylor, J. H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1991-01
- Volume
- 366
- Pages
- 501
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2063883301
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the orbital period change of the binary pulsar PSR 1913 + 16. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/169585
- The paper
- Damour, T., & Taylor, J. H. (1991). On the orbital period change of the binary pulsar PSR 1913 + 16. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/169585
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.