The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Toward Better Ways to Measure the Galaxy Correlation Function
Abstract
This paper describes a number of ways to improve on the standard method of measuring the two-point correlation, or covariance, function of large-scale structure in the universe. (1) It is shown that the statistic commonly used to estimate the covariance function has the defect that its uncertainty on large scales is limited by the uncertainty in the mean density. An alternative estimator is proposed which does not suffer from this limitation. The alternative estimator should be more accurate all on scales, but particularly on large scales where the covariance function is small. (2) Use of the sample mean biases the estimate of the covariance function by missing out variance on scales comparable to the scale of the sample. A revised estimator of the covariance function is proposed which allows missing large-scale variance to be restored. (3) It is shown from first principles how to estimate the uncertainties in the covariance function of a sample. A practical way to carry out the error analysis is suggested. (4) An approximate minimum-variance pair weighting for the calculation of the covariance function is derived, and a practical implementation is suggested. (5) The question of the calculation of background pair counts is discussed, with emphasis on the problem of the anisotropy of the redshift covariance function. Various analytic results are presented on angular integrals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
The Luminosity and Color Dependence of the Galaxy Correlation Function
Zehavi, I., Zheng, Z., Weinberg, D. H., Frieman, J. A., Berlind, A. A., Blanton, M. R., Scoccimarro, R., Sheth, R. K., Strauss, M. A., Kayo, I., et al. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/431891 · Cited by 818
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
A measurement of the cosmological mass density from clustering in the 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey
Peacock, J. A., Cole, S., Norberg, P., Baugh, C. M., Bland-Hawthorn, J., Bridges, T., Cannon, R. D., Colless, M., Collins, C., Couch, W., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35065528 · Cited by 708
Significance of the largest scale CMB fluctuations in WMAP
de Oliveira-Costa, A., Tegmark, M., Zaldarriaga, M., & Hamilton, A. (2004) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.69.063516 · Cited by 651
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamilton, A. J. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 417
- Pages
- 19
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2051869499
- Cited by
- 372
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toward Better Ways to Measure the Galaxy Correlation Function. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/173288
- The paper
- Hamilton, A. J. S. (1993). Toward Better Ways to Measure the Galaxy Correlation Function. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/173288
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.