The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Our Sun. III. Present and Future
Abstract
Self-consistent evolutionary models were computed for our Sun, using Los Alamos interior opacities and Sharp molecular opacities, starting with contraction on the Hayashi track, and fitting the observed present solar L, R, and Z/X at the solar age. This resulted in presolar Y = 0.274 and Z = 0.01954, and in present solar 37Cl and 71Ga neutrino capture rates of 6.53 and 123 SNU, respectively. We explored the Sun's future. While on the hydrogen-burning main sequence, the Sun's luminosity grows from 0.7 Lsun, 4.5 Gyr ago, to 2.2 Lsun, 6.5 Gyr from now. A luminosity of 1.1 Lsun will be reached in 1.1 Gyr, and 1.4 Lsun in 3.5 Gyr; at these luminosities, Kasting predicts "moist greenhouse" and "runaway greenhouse" catastrophes, respectively, using a cloud-free climate model of the Earth; clouds could delay these catastrophes somewhat. As the Sun ascends the red giant branch (RGB), its convective envelope encompasses 75% of its mass (diluting remaining 7Li by two orders of magnitude; 4He is enhanced by 8%, 3He by a factor of 5.7, 13C by a factor of 3, and 14N by a factor of 1.5). The Sun eventually reaches a luminosity of 2300 Lsun and a radius of 170 Rsun on the RGB, shedding 0.275 Msun and engulfing the planet Mercury. After the horizontal branch stage (core helium burning), the Sun climbs the asymptotic giant branch (AGB), encountering four thermal pulses there; at the first thermal pulse, the Sun reaches its largest radial extent of 213 Rsun (0.99 AU), which is surprisingly close to Earth's present orbit. However, at this point the Sun's mass has been reduced to 0.591 Msun, and the orbits of Venus and Earth have moved out to 1.22 and 1.69 AU, respectively they both escape being engulfed. The Sun reaches a peak luminosity of 5200 Lsun at the fourth thermal pulse. It ends up as a white dwarf with a final mass of 0.541 Msun, shifting the orbits of the planets outward such that Venus and Earth end up at 1.34 and 1.85 AU, respectively. These events on the AGB are strongly mass-loss dependent; somewhat less mass loss can result in engulfment of Venus, or even Earth. Our preferred mass-loss rate was a Reimers wind with a mass-loss parameter η = 0.6 normalized from inferred mass loss in globular cluster stars. For reasonable mass-loss rates (0.8 > η > 0.4), the Sun's final white dwarf mass is between 0.51 and 0.58 Msun. The Sun spends 11 Gyr on the main sequence, 0.7 Gyr cooling toward the RGB, 0.6 Gyr ascending the RGB, 0.1 Gyr on the horizontal branch, 0.02 Gyr on the early AGB, 0.0004 Gyr on the thermally pulsing AGB, and 0.0001 Gyr on the traverse to the planetary nebula stage (the last three of these time scales depend sensitively on the amount of mass loss).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Climate sensitivity, sea level and atmospheric carbon dioxide
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Russell, G., & Kharecha, P. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2012.0294 · Cited by 660
Emergence of a Habitable Planet
Zahnle, K., Arndt, N., Cockell, C., Halliday, A., Nisbet, E., Selsis, F., & Sleep, N. H. (2007) · Space Science Reviews · doi:10.1007/s11214-007-9225-z · Cited by 380
The CNO Isotopes: Deep Circulation in Red Giants and First and Second Dredge‐up
Boothroyd, A. I., & Sackmann, I. ‐. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306546 · Cited by 348
Self-citationPerryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
Habitable Zone Limits for Dry Planets
Abe, Y., Abe-Ouchi, A., Sleep, N. H., & Zahnle, K. J. (2011) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2010.0545 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Sackmann, I.-J., Boothroyd, A. I., & Kraemer, K. E.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1993-11
- Volume
- 418
- Pages
- 457
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1966988677
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Our Sun. III. Present and Future. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/173407
- The paper
- Sackmann, I.-J., Boothroyd, A. I., & Kraemer, K. E. (1993). Our Sun. III. Present and Future. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/173407
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.