The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Skewness and kurtosis in large-scale cosmic fields
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, I present the calculation of the third and fourth moments of both the distribution function of the large--scale density and the large--scale divergence of the velocity field, $\theta$. These calculations are made by the mean of perturbative calculations assuming Gaussian initial conditions and are expected to be valid in the linear or quasi linear regime. The moments are derived for a top--hat window function and for any cosmological parameters $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$. It turns out that the dependence with $\Lambda$ is always very weak whereas the moments of the distribution function of the divergence are strongly dependent on $\Omega$. A method to measure $\Omega$ using the skewness of this field has already been presented by Bernardeau et al. (1993). I show here that the simultaneous measurement of the skewness and the kurtosis allows to test the validity of the gravitational instability scenario hypothesis. Indeed there is a combination of the first three moments of $\theta$ that is almost independent of the cosmological parameters $\Omega$ and $\Lambda$, $${(<\theta^4>-3<\theta^2>^2) <\theta^2> \over <\theta^3>^2}\approx 1.5,$$ (the value quoted is valid when the index of the power spectrum at the filtering scale is close to -1) so that any cosmic velocity field created by gravitational instabilities should verify such a property.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Desjacques, V., Jeong, D., & Schmidt, F. (2018) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.002 · Cited by 817
Transients from initial conditions in cosmological simulations
Crocce, M., Pueblas, S., & Scoccimarro, R. (2006) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11040.x · Cited by 657
The density and peculiar velocity fields of nearby galaxies
Strauss, M. A., & Willick, J. A. (1995) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/0370-1573(95)00013-7 · Cited by 567
Towards precision constraints on gravity with the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
Bose, B., Koyama, K., Lewandowski, M., Vernizzi, F., & Winther, H. A. (2018) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2018/04/063 · Cited by 57
Revealing modified gravity signals in matter and halo hierarchical clustering
Hellwing, W. A., Koyama, K., Bose, B., & Zhao, G.-B. (2017) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.96.023515 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Bernardeau, F.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 433
- Pages
- 1
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2024870709
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Skewness and kurtosis in large-scale cosmic fields. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/174620
- The paper
- Bernardeau, F. (1994). Skewness and kurtosis in large-scale cosmic fields. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/174620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.