Towards precision constraints on gravity with the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure
Open accessAbstract
We compare analytical computations with numerical simulations for dark-matter clustering, in general relativity and in the normal branch of DGP gravity (nDGP). Our analytical frameword is the Effective Field Theory of Large-Scale Structure (EFTofLSS), which we use to compute the one-loop dark-matter power spectrum, including the resummation of infrared bulk displacement effects. We compare this to a set of 20 COLA simulations at redshifts z = 0, z = 0.5, and z = 1, and fit the free parameter of the EFTofLSS, called the speed of sound, in both ΛCDM and nDGP at each redshift. At one-loop at z = 0, the reach of the EFTofLSS is k reach ≈ 0.14 Mpc −1 for both ΛCDM and nDGP. Along the way, we compare two different infrared resummation schemes and two different treatments of the time dependence of the perturbative expansion, concluding that they agree to approximately 1% over the scales of interest. Finally, we use the ratio of the COLA power spectra to make a precision measurement of the difference between the speeds of sound in ΛCDM and nDGP, and verify that this is proportional to the modification of the linear coupling constant of the Poisson equation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
nDGP models are used as benchmarks to develop and test frameworks for modified gravity studies, including in the nonlinear regime.
“nDGP are used as benchmark to develop and test frameworks for MG studies as in for example the nonlinear regime, e.g., Hellwing et al. (2017) and Bose et al. (2018).”
From Testing general relativity in cosmology (2019) · cites this paper as Bose et al. (2018)
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 104 · Cited by 57
- Authors
- Bose, B., Koyama, K., Lewandowski, M., Vernizzi, F., & Winther, H. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Portsmouth (GB)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Venue
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2018-04-27
- Volume
- 2018
- Issue
- 04
- Pages
- 063-063
- ISSN
- 1475-7508 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-7516
- OpenAlex
- W2785394694
- Cited by
- 57
- References
- 104
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-12-BS05-0002)
- Science and Technology Facilities Council (ST/N000668/1, ST/J005428/1)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena
- Keywords
- effective field theory of large-scale structure, dark matter power spectrum, infrared resummation, sound velocity, modified gravity, Poisson equation, dark matter clustering, general relativity, redshift dependence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review