The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Model atmospheres for M (sub)dwarf stars. 1: The base model grid
Open accessAbstract
We have calculated a grid of more than 700 model atmospheres valid for a wide range of parameters encompassing the coolest known M~dwarfs, M~subdwarfs and brown dwarf candidates: $1500\le \teff \le 4000\,$K, $3.5\le \log(g)\le 5.5$, and $-4.0\le { [M/H]}\le +0.5$. Our equation of state includes 105 molecules and up to 27 ionization stages of 39 elements. In the calculations of the base grid of model atmospheres presented here, we include over 300 molecular bands of 4 molecules (TiO, VO, CaH, FeH) in the JOLA approximation, the water opacity of Ludwig (1971), collision induced opacities, b-f and f-f atomic processes, as well as about 2 million spectral lines selected from a list with more than 42 million atomic and 24 million molecular (H$_2$, CH, NH, OH, MgH, SiH, C$_2$, CN, CO, SiO) lines. High-resolution synthetic spectra are obtained using an opacity sampling method. The model atmospheres and spectra are calculated with the generalized stellar atmosphere code PHOENIX, assuming LTE, plane-parallel geometry, energy (radiative plus convective) conservation, and hydrostatic equilibrium. The model spectra give close agreement with observations of M~dwarfs across a wide spectral range from the blue to the near-IR, with one notable exception: the fit to the water bands. We discuss several practical applications of our model grid, e.g., broadband colors derived from the synthetic spectra. In light of current efforts to identify genuine brown dwarfs, we also show how low-resolution spectra of cool dwarfs vary with surface gravity, and how the high-resolution line profile of the Li~I resonance doublet depends on the Li abundance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ferguson, J. W., Alexander, D. R., Allard, F., Barman, T., Bodnarik, J. G., Hauschildt, P. H., Heffner‐Wong, A., & Tamanai, A. (2005) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/428642 · Cited by 1,327
Self-citationHauschildt, P. H., Allard, F., & Baron, E. (1999) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/306745 · Cited by 1,207
Self-citationThe Limiting Effects of Dust in Brown Dwarf Model Atmospheres
Allard, F., Hauschildt, P. H., Alexander, D. R., Tamanai, A., & Schweitzer, A. (2001) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/321547 · Cited by 1,062
Self-citationModels of very-low-mass stars, brown dwarfs and exoplanets
Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0269 · Cited by 921
Self-citationThe theory of brown dwarfs and extrasolar giant planets
Burrows, A., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., & Liebert, J. (2001) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.73.719 · Cited by 819
Metadata
- Authors
- Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 445
- Pages
- 433
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W2055488747
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Model atmospheres for M (sub)dwarf stars. 1: The base model grid. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/175708
- The paper
- Allard, F., & Hauschildt, P. H. (1995). Model atmospheres for M (sub)dwarf stars. 1: The base model grid. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/175708
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.