The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eigenmode Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys. I. Theory and Methods
Open accessAbstract
We describe a method for estimating the power spectrum of density fluctuations from galaxy redshift surveys that yields improvement in both accuracy and resolution over direct Fourier analysis. The key feature of this analysis is expansion of the observed density field in the unique set of statistically orthogonal spatial functions that obtains for a given survey's geometry and selection function and the known properties of galaxy clustering (the Karhunen-Loeve transform). Each of these eigenmodes of the observed density field optimally weights the data to yield the cleanest (highest signal-to-noise ratio) possible measure of clustering power as a function of wavelength scale for any survey. Using Bayesian methods, we simultaneously estimate the mean density, power spectrum of density fluctuations, and redshift distortion parameters that best fit the observed data. This method is particularly important for analysis of surveys with small sky coverage, which are comprised of disjoint regions (e.g., an ensemble of pencil beams or slices), or that have large fluctuations in sampling density. We present algorithms for practical application of this technique to galaxy survey data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Large-scale structure of the Universe and cosmological perturbation theory
Bernardeau, F., Colombi, S., Gaztañaga, E., & Scoccimarro, R. (2002) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/s0370-1573(02)00135-7 · Cited by 1,922
Testing general relativity in cosmology
Ishak, M. (2019) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4 · Cited by 449
The 4 Year COBE Normalization and Large‐Scale Structure
Bunn, E. F., & White, M. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/303955 · Cited by 423
SKA weak lensing – I. Cosmological forecasts and the power of radio-optical cross-correlations
Harrison, I., Camera, S., Zuntz, J., & Brown, M. L. (2016) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2082 · Cited by 69
Cosmic tomographies: baryon acoustic oscillations and weak lensing
Zhan, H. (2006) · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2006/08/008 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Vogeley, M. S., & Szalay, A. S.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 465
- Pages
- 34
- ISSN
- 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4357
- OpenAlex
- W1973175534
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eigenmode Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys. I. Theory and Methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177399
- The paper
- Vogeley, M. S., & Szalay, A. S. (1996). Eigenmode Analysis of Galaxy Redshift Surveys. I. Theory and Methods. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.