Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 766

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Structure of Stationary Photodissociation Fronts

Open access
Draine, B. T., Bertoldi, Frank·1996·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

The structure of stationary photodissociation fronts is revisited. H2 self-shielding is discussed, including the effects of line overlap. We find that line overlap is important for N(H2) ≥ 1020 cm-2, with a factor-of-2 suppression of pumping rates at column densities N(H2) 3 x 1020 cm-2 cm-2. We compute multiline UV pumping models and compare these with simple analytic approximations for the effects of self-shielding. The overall fluorescent efficiency of the photodissociation front is obtained for different ratios of χ/nH (where χ characterizes the intensity of the illuminating ultraviolet radiation) and different dust extinction laws. The dust optical depth τpdr to the point where 50% of the H is molecular is found to be a simple function of a dimensionless quantity φ0 depending on χ/nH, the rate coefficient R(T) for H2 formation on grains, and the UV dust opacity. The fluorescent efficiency of the photodissocation region (PDR) also depends primarily on φ for χ ≤ 3000 and nH ≤ 104 cm-3; for stronger radiation fields and higher densities, radiative and collisional depopulation of vibrationally excited levels interferes with the radiative cascade. We show that the emission spectrum from the PDR is essentially independent of the color temperature Tcolor of the illuminating radiation for 104 K Tcolor but shows some sensitivity to the rotation-vibration distribution of newly formed H2. The 1-0 S(1)/2-1 S(1) and 2-1 S(1)/6-4 Q(1) intensity ratios, the ortho/para ratio, and the rotational temperature in the v = 1 and v = 2 levels are computed as functions of the temperature and density for different values of χ/nH. We apply our models to the reflection nebula NGC 2023. Apparent inconsistencies between published K-band and far-red spectroscopy of this object are discussed; we adjust the two sets of observations for consistency. We are able to reproduce approximately the (adjusted) observations with models having χ = 5000, nH = 105 cm-3, and a reasonable viewing angle. Further observations of NGC 2023 will be valuable to clarify the uncertain spatial structure of the emission.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/177689

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 766

Metadata

Authors
Draine, B. T., & Bertoldi, F.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1996-09
Volume
468
Pages
269
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2004052728
Cited by
766
References
0
FWCI
12.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Structure of Stationary Photodissociation Fronts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/177689
The paper
Draine, B. T., & Bertoldi, F. (1996). Structure of Stationary Photodissociation Fronts. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/177689

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.