Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Expanding Relativistic Shells and Gamma‐Ray Burst Temporal Structure

Open access
Fenimore, Edward E., Madras, Claudine D., Nayakshin, Sergei·1996·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Many models of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) involve a shell expanding at extreme relativistic speeds. The shell of material expands in a photon-quiet phase for a period t 0 and then becomes gamma-ray active, perhaps due to inhomogeneities in the interstellar medium or the generation of shocks. Based on kinematics, we relate the envelope of the emission of the event to the characteristics of the photon-quiet and photon-active phases. We initially assume local spherical symmetry wherein, on average, the same conditions prevail over the shell's surface within angles the order of Γ –1 , where Γ is the Lorentz factor for the bulk motion. The contribution of the curvature to the temporal structure is comparable to the contribution from the overall expansion. As a result, GRB time histories from a shell should have an envelope similar to "FRED" (fast rise, exponential decay) events in which the rise time is related to the duration of the photon-active phase and the fall time is related to the duration of the photon-quiet phase. This result depends only on local spherical symmetry and, since most GRBs do not have such envelopes, we introduce the "shell symmetry" problem: the observed time history envelopes of most GRBs do not agree with that expected for a relativistic expanding shell.Although FREDs have the signature of a relativistic shell, they may not be due to a single shell, as required by some cosmological models. Some FREDs have precursors in which the peaks are separated by more than the expansion time required to explain FRED shape. Such a burst is most likely explained by a central engine; that is, the separation of the multiple peaks occurs because the central site produced multiple releases of energy on timescales comparable to the duration of the event. Alternatively, there still could be local spherical symmetry of the bulk material, but with a low "filling factor"; that is, only a few percent of the viewable surface (which is already very small, 4πΓ –2 ) ever becomes gamma-ray active.Long complex bursts present a myriad of problems for the models. The duration of the event at the detector is ~ t 0 /(2Γ 2 ). The long duration cannot be due to large t 0 , since it requires too much energy to sweep up the interstellar medium. Nor can it be due to small Σ if the time variation is due to ambient objects, since the density of such objects is unreasonable (~10 18 Γ –4 pc –3 for typical parameters). Long events must explain why they almost always violate local spherical symmetry or why they have low filling factors.Both precursor and long complex events are likely to be "central engines" that produce multiple releases of energy over ~100 s. One promising alternative scenario is one in which the shell becomes thicker than the radius of the curvature within Γ –1 . Then it acts as a parallel slab, eliminating the problems associated with local spherical symmetry.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/178210

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Fenimore, E. E., Madras, C. D., & Nayakshin, S.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1996-12-20
Volume
473
Issue
2
Pages
998-1012
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2090771094
Cited by
275
References
0
FWCI
11.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Expanding Relativistic Shells and Gamma‐Ray Burst Temporal Structure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/178210
The paper
Fenimore, E. E., Madras, C. D., & Nayakshin, S. (1996). Expanding Relativistic Shells and Gamma‐Ray Burst Temporal Structure. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/178210

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.