Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 602

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Thermal equilibria of accretion disks

Open access
Abramowicz, Marek A., Chen, Xingming, Kato, Shoji, Lasota, Jean-Pierre, Regev, Oded·1995·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

We show that most of hot, optically thin accretion disk models which ignore advective cooling are not self-consistent. We have found new types of optically thin disk solutions where cooling is dominated by radial advection of heat. These new solutions are thermally and viscously stable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/187709

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 602

Metadata

Authors
Abramowicz, M. A., Chen, X., Kato, S., Lasota, J.-P., & Regev, O.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
1995-01
Volume
438
Pages
L37
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2057386138
Cited by
602
References
0
FWCI
22.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thermal equilibria of accretion disks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/187709
The paper
Abramowicz, M. A., Chen, X., Kato, S., Lasota, J.-P., & Regev, O. (1995). Thermal equilibria of accretion disks. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1086/187709

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.