The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Post-asymptotic giant branch evolution of low- to intermediate-mass stars
Abstract
In this paper, we present the results for the post-AGB phases of stellar evolutionary sequences, complete from the main-sequence phase, through the AGB phase, and on into the planetary nebula and white dwarf regimes. Mass loss has been included using an empirical formalism derived from observed mass-loss rates of planetary nebula nuclei available in the literature and from radiation-pressure-driven stellar wind theory. Models are calculated for initial masses 0.89, 0.95, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5, and 5.0 M_sun_, and metallicities 0.016, 0.008, 0.004, and 0.001. These abundance and mass values were chosen to allow comparison with Galactic, and Magellanic Cloud planetary nebulae and their nuclei. The post-AGB evolutionary sequences fall into two distinct groups depending on when the planetary nebula nuclei leave the AGB: one group where helium-shell burning is dominant, and the other group where hydrogen-shell burning is dominant. Of the 27 computed sequences: 17 are hydrogen-burners, and 10 are helium-burners. In only five cases was any effort made to control the phase of departure from the AGB. Lower mass models are more likely to leave the AGB burning helium, as the preceding AGB evolution has a mass- loss rate which is greatest immediately prior to a helium-shell flash. The calculations are compared with the large observational database that has developed over recent years for the Large Magellanic Cloud. These calculations will be useful for determining the planetary nebula luminosity function, and for the study of the ultraviolet excess observed in elliptical galaxies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003
Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. (2003) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x · Cited by 10,500
MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D. (2016) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 · Cited by 2,922
Mass-loss predictions for O and B stars as a function of metallicity
Vink, J. S., de Koter, A., & Lamers, H. J. G. L. M. (2001) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010127 · Cited by 1,727
Modeling the Panchromatic Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies
Conroy, C. (2013) · Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics · doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017 · Cited by 959
Girardi, L., Groenewegen, M. A. T., Hatziminaoglou, E., & da Costa, L. (2005) · Astronomy & Astrophysics · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042352 · Cited by 640
Metadata
- Authors
- Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R.
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 1994-05
- Volume
- 92
- Pages
- 125
- ISSN
- 0067-0049 (ISSN-L)
- 1538-4365
- OpenAlex
- W2088153665
- Cited by
- 506
- References
- 0
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Post-asymptotic giant branch evolution of low- to intermediate-mass stars. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/191962
- The paper
- Vassiliadis, E., & Wood, P. R. (1994). Post-asymptotic giant branch evolution of low- to intermediate-mass stars. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. https://doi.org/10.1086/191962
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.