Cited by 2,922Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesAstronomy and Astrophysical ResearchGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena

MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS

Open access
Choi, Jieun, Dotter, Aaron, Conroy, Charlie, Cantiello, Matteo, Paxton, Bill, Johnson, Benjamin D.·2016·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

This is the first of a series of papers presenting the Modules for Experiments in Stellar Astrophysics (MESA) Isochrones and Stellar Tracks (MIST) project, a new comprehensive set of stellar evolutionary tracks and isochrones computed using MESA, a state-of-the-art open-source 1D stellar evolution package. In this work, we present models with solar-scaled abundance ratios covering a wide range of ages ( ), masses ( ), and metallicities ( ). The models are self-consistently and continuously evolved from the pre-main sequence (PMS) to the end of hydrogen burning, the white dwarf cooling sequence, or the end of carbon burning, depending on the initial mass. We also provide a grid of models evolved from the PMS to the end of core helium burning for . We showcase extensive comparisons with observational constraints as well as with some of the most widely used existing models in the literature. The evolutionary tracks and isochrones can be downloaded from the project website at http://waps.cfa.harvard.edu/MIST/ .

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • They repeated the entire SFH fitting for a representative subset of roughly one third of their regions using MIST isochrones in place of Padova tracks.

    “To assess the impact of these model choices in PHAST, we repeated the entire SFH fitting for a representative subset consisting of roughly a third of our regions using the MIST (Choi et al. 2016) isochrones in place of the Padova (Marigo et al. 2008; Girardi et al. 2010) tracks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., Cantiello, M., Paxton, B., & Johnson, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Center for Astrophysics Harvard & Smithsonian (US)
  • Australian National University (AU)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2016-05-26
Volume
823
Issue
2
Pages
102
ISSN
  • 0004-637X (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-4357
OpenAlex
W2344233738
Cited by
2,922
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 297 · 2025: 416 · 2024: 426 · 2023: 370 · 2022: 330 · 2021: 308 · 2020: 292 · 2019: 217 · 2018: 166 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 19
FWCI
76.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Astrophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1313280, 25915)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (PHY11-25915, NNX15AK14G, NNX13AI46G)
  • Harvard University
  • Australian Research Council (FL110100012)
  • Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara (PHY-11-25915)
  • FAS Division of Science, Harvard University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Instrumentation › Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Keywords
stellar evolution, isochrones, evolutionary tracks, solar metallicity, abundance ratios, pre-main sequence, white dwarf cooling, carbon burning, core helium burning, hydrogen burning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review