Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 746

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence

Open access
Park, C. Whan, Lessig, V. Parker·1977·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Two different samples consisting of housewives and students, respectively, were examined in terms of differences in their susceptibility to reference group influence. The results reveal significant differences between housewives and students in terms of the influence which the three types of reference groups have upon brand selection. The findings raise a serious question concerning the external validity of studies which use students as subjects yet make generalizations to a broader population base.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/208685

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 746

Metadata

Authors
Park, C. W., & Lessig, V. P.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
1977-09
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
102
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2164552585
Cited by
746
References
3
FWCI
4.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.