Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 261

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Children's Use of Cognitive Defenses Against Television Advertising: A Cognitive Response Approach

Brucks, Merrie, Armstrong, Gary M., Goldberg, Marvin E.·1988·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

This study employs a cognitive response approach using non-directive probes rather than direct questions to assess the effects of advertising knowledge and the presence of a cue on thoughts produced by 9 to 10-year-old children while watching commercials. The number of counterarguments produced indicates children's use of cognitive defenses. The study found that advertising knowledge did not result in increased counterarguments against advertisements unless a cue was present to activate that knowledge. Direct questions (as opposed to non-directive probes) themselves appear to activate advertising knowledge, thus overestimating children's actual use of cognitive defenses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/209129

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 261

Metadata

Authors
Brucks, M., Armstrong, G. M., & Goldberg, M. E.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
1988-03
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
471
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2098041065
Cited by
261
References
0
FWCI
14.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Children's Use of Cognitive Defenses Against Television Advertising: A Cognitive Response Approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209129
The paper
Brucks, M., Armstrong, G. M., & Goldberg, M. E. (1988). Children's Use of Cognitive Defenses Against Television Advertising: A Cognitive Response Approach. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209129

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.