The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Asymmetric Response to Price in Consumer Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions
Abstract
The study investigates whether consumers exhibit asymmetry (i.e., different sensitivity) to negative (“loss”) and positive (“gain”) differences between the reference price and the purchase price in brand choice and purchase quantity decisions. Using panel data for two frequently purchased products with three brands in each product category, we find that consumers loyal to a brand (“loyals”) respond to gain and loss with the same sensitivity in brand choice decisions. However, consumers not loyal to any brand (“switchers”) respond more strongly to gains than to losses. In purchase quantity decisions, brand-loyal consumers are found to respond asymmetrically to gains and losses, but the direction of the asymmetry depends on whether the decision is made before or after the household inventory reaches a stock-out level (i.e., the level at which the household inventory needs to be replenished). When the decision is made after a stock-out, brand-loyal consumers are more responsive to a gain in the price of their favorite brand than to a loss. In contrast, when the quantity decision is made before a stock-out, loyals are more sensitive to a loss than to a gain. In only two of the six brands examined do we find evidence of asymmetry in switchers' quantity decisions. In both cases, switchers respond more strongly to a price loss than to a gain, regardless of whether the purchase decision is made before or after a stock-out.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lichtenstein, D. R., Netemeyer, R. G., & Burton, S. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400305 · Cited by 1,054
Promotion Signal: Proxy for a Price Cut?
Inman, J. J., McAlister, L., & Hoyer, W. D. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208538 · Cited by 483
Cited by
Implications of Loyalty Program Membership and Service Experiences for Customer Retention and Value
Bolton, R. N., Kannan, P. K., & Bramlett, M. D. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281009 · Cited by 1,157
Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions
Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84 · Cited by 848
Self-citationUPC Scanner Pricing Systems: Are They Accurate?
Goodstein, R. C. (1994) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299405800202 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-12
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 387
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2066482158
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.