Cited by 1,157Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyCustomer churn and segmentationConsumer Market Behavior and Pricing

Implications of Loyalty Program Membership and Service Experiences for Customer Retention and Value

Open access
Bolton, R. N., Kannan, P. K., Bramlett, M. D.·2000·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0092070300281009

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [15]15. Gilly, Mary C. and Betsy D. Gelb. 1982. "Post-Purchase Customer Proc- esses and the Complaining Customer." Journal of Customer Re- search 9 (December): 323-328.
  2. [19]19.  and Seigyoung Auh. 1999. "Compatability Effects in Evalua- tions of Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty." International Journal of Research in Marketing 17 (4).
  3. [26]26. Luce, Mary Frances. 1998. "Choosing to Avoid: Coping With Negatively Emotion-Laden Customer Decisions." Journal of Customer Re- search 24 (March): 409-424.
  4. [39]39. Schul, Yaacov and Miriam Schiff. 1993. "Measuring Satisfaction With Organizations." Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (4): 536-551.
  5. [45]45. Uncles, Mark and Gilles Laurent. 1997. "Editorial, Special Issue on Loy- alty." International Journal of Research in Marketing 14: 399-404.
  6. [46]46. Zahorik, Anthony J. and Roland T. Rust. 1992. "Modeling the Impact of Service Quality on Profitability: A Review." In Advances in Services Marketing, Vol 1. Eds. T. Swartz and R. Oliver. Greenwich, CT: JAI, 247-276.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bolton, R. N., Kannan, P. K., & Bramlett, M. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Oklahoma (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
95-108
ISSN
0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1973849164
Cited by
1,157
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 50 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 61 · 2014: 79 · 2013: 66 · 2012: 70
FWCI
29.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
  • SHAREOK (University of Oklahoma; Oklahoma State University; Central Oklahoma University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
Keywords
customer retention, service experience, consumer evaluation, repurchase intention, perceived value, customer switching, financial services, relationship duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review