Comparing Consumers’ Recall of Prepurchase and Postpurchase Product Evaluation Experiences
Abstract
This study explores the phenomenon of postpurchase product evaluations primarily by comparing consumers' recalled postpurchase evaluation experiences with their recalled prepurchase evaluation experiences. Personal interviews and retrospective verbalizations were employed so that respondents could describe the phenomena in their own experiences and words. A secondary comparison was also made between consumers' postpurchase evaluation experiences in general versus those specifically cued by the terms “satisfaction” and “dissatisfaction.” While some similarities exist, the results show important differences between respondents' postpurchase thoughts versus those from both prepurchase and satisfaction. Significant implications of these results for theory, measurement, and future research are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recall method is typically used to tap into individuals' long-term memory where information specific to one's personal history or experiences is stored.
“Recall method is typically used to tap into individuals' long-term memory where information specific to one's personal history or experiences is stored.”
From Trust, Satisfaction, and Online Repurchase Intention: The Moderating Role of Perceived Effectiveness of E-Commerce Institutional Mechanisms1 (2014) · cites this paper as Gardial et al. 1994
Cites
A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions
Oliver, R. L. (1980) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378001700405 · Cited by 14,494 · see citing works
Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.3.231 · Cited by 11,317 · see citing works
Bettman, J. R., & Park, C. W. (1980) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208812 · Cited by 1,344 · see citing works
Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information
Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209228 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.3.65.18028 · Cited by 1,305 · see citing works
Fang, Y., Qureshi, I., Sun, H., McCole, P., Ramsey, E., & Lim, K. H. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.2.04 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Jin, N. P., Lee, S., & Lee, H. (2015) · International Journal of Tourism Research · doi:10.1002/jtr.1968 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Lu, B., Wang, Z., & Zhang, S. (2021) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2021.103504 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gardial, S. F., Clemons, D. S., Woodruff, R. B., Schumann, D. W., & Burns, M. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-03
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 548
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2015479644
- Cited by
- 392
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 6.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- consumer recall, customer satisfaction, customer dissatisfaction, customer experience
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review