Cited by 392Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Behavior and Marketing InfluenceConsumer Retail Behavior Studies

Comparing Consumers’ Recall of Prepurchase and Postpurchase Product Evaluation Experiences

Gardial, Sarah Fisher, Clemons, D. Scott, Woodruff, Robert B., Schumann, David W., Burns, Mary Jane·1994·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

This study explores the phenomenon of postpurchase product evaluations primarily by comparing consumers' recalled postpurchase evaluation experiences with their recalled prepurchase evaluation experiences. Personal interviews and retrospective verbalizations were employed so that respondents could describe the phenomena in their own experiences and words. A secondary comparison was also made between consumers' postpurchase evaluation experiences in general versus those specifically cued by the terms “satisfaction” and “dissatisfaction.” While some similarities exist, the results show important differences between respondents' postpurchase thoughts versus those from both prepurchase and satisfaction. Significant implications of these results for theory, measurement, and future research are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/209369

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Gardial, S. F., Clemons, D. S., Woodruff, R. B., Schumann, D. W., & Burns, M. J.
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
1994-03
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
548
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2015479644
Cited by
392
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Retail Behavior Studies
Keywords
consumer recall, customer satisfaction, customer dissatisfaction, customer experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review