Cited by 481Consumer Market Behavior and PricingDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Consumer Skepticism of Advertising Claims: Testing Hypotheses from Economics of Information

Ford, Gary T., Smith, Darlene B., Swasy, John L.·1990·Journal of Consumer Research

Abstract

Propositions regarding consumers' differential skepticism for search, experience, and credence claims are tested in an experiment using adult consumers. The results provide clear support for Nelson's (1970) hypotheses that consumers are more skeptical of experience than search attribute claims and more skeptical of subjective than of objective claims. No support is found, however, for the Darby and Kami (1973) hypothesis that consumers will be more skeptical of credence than of experience attribute claims or for the hypothesis that consumers will not be less skeptical of experience claims for low-priced goods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/209228

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of claim specificity on claim credibility is similar to that of objective (rather than subjective) information and of substantive (rather than associative) claims.

    “Whilst independent and distinct, the impact of claim specificity on claim credibility is similar to that of objective (rather than subjective) information (Ford, Smith and Swasy, 1990; Holbrook, 1978), and of substantive (rather than associative) claims (Chan, 2000; Chan and Lau, 2004).”

    From How Claim Specificity Can Improve Claim Credibility in Green Advertising (2018) · cites this paper as Ford, Smith and Swasy, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, G. T., Smith, D. B., & Swasy, J. L.
Affiliations
American University (US)
Venue
Journal of Consumer Research
Published
1990-03
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
433
ISSN
  • 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5277
OpenAlex
W2153194202
Cited by
481
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
FWCI
25.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Consumer Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
advertising skepticism, advertising claims, information economics, consumer trust in advertising

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review