The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models
Abstract
The effect of reference price on brand choice decisions has been well documented in the literature. Researchers, however, have differed in their conceptualizations and, therefore, in their modeling of reference price. In this article, we evaluate five alternative models of reference price of which two are stimulus based (i.e., based on information available at the point-of-purchase) and three that are memory based (i.e., based on price history and/or other contextual factors). We calibrate the models using scanner panel data for peanut butter, liquid detergent, ground coffee, and tissue. To account for heterogeneity in model parameters, we employ a latent class approach and select the best segmentation scheme for each model. The best model of reference price is then selected on the basis of fit and prediction, as well as on the basis of parsimony in cases where the fits of the models are not very different. In all four categories, we find that the best reference price model is a memory-based model, namely, one that is based on the brand's own price history. In the liquid detergent category, however, we find that one of the stimulus-based models, namely, the current price of a previously chosen brand, also performs fairly well. We discuss the implications of these findings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice
Hardie, B. G. S., Johnson, E. J., & Fader, P. S. (1993) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.12.4.378 · Cited by 903
Cited by
Reference Price Research: Review and Propositions
Mazumdar, T., Raj, S. P., & Sinha, I. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.84 · Cited by 848
Self-citationDynamic Pricing Strategies with Reference Effects
Popescu, I., & Wu, Y. (2007) · Operations Research · doi:10.1287/opre.1070.0393 · Cited by 447
Dynamic Pricing on the Internet: Importance and Implications for Consumer Behavior
(2001) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.1080/10864415.2001.11044211 · Cited by 309
Measuring the Price Knowledge Shoppers Bring to the Store
Vanhuele, M., & Drèze, X. (2002) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.66.4.72.18516 · Cited by 287
Personalized pricing and price fairness
Richards, T. J., Liaukonyte, J., & Streletskaya, N. A. (2016) · International Journal of Industrial Organization · doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.11.004 · Cited by 99
Metadata
- Authors
- Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-09
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 202-214
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2029864946
- Cited by
- 475
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209505
- The paper
- Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P. (1997). A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.