The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring the Price Knowledge Shoppers Bring to the Store
Abstract
Reference price research suggests that consumers memorize and recall price information when selecting brands for frequently purchased products. Previous price-knowledge surveys, however, indicate that memory for prices is lower than expected. In this study, the authors show that these price-knowledge surveys provide imperfect estimates of price knowledge, because they focus only on recall and short-term memory. The authors propose, instead, to use a combination of price recall, price recognition, and deal recognition to measure the degree to which consumers use auditory verbal, visual Arabic, or analogue magnitude representations to memorize prices. The authors show how the combination of these three measures provides a much richer understanding of consumers' knowledge of prices. The results suggest that the price knowledge involved in reference prices may often not be accessible to recall but shows up in price recognition and deal recognition. In addition, the authors identify consumer and product characteristics that explain the variations in price knowledge. They find, for example, that frequent promotions increase consumers' ability to remember regular prices and that store switchers do not possess better price knowledge than other shoppers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2025) · doi:10.53555/acr.v2i2 · Cited by 13,264
Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence.
Mandler, G. (1980) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.87.3.252 · Cited by 2,849
Inhibitory Processes in Attention, Memory and Language
Carr, T. H., & Dagenbach, D. (1994) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,276
Varieties of numerical abilities
Dehaene, S. (1992) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90049-n · Cited by 1,972
The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers
Dickson, P. R., & Sawyer, A. G. (1990) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299005400304 · Cited by 1,117
A Reference Price Model of Brand Choice for Frequently Purchased Products
Winer, R. S. (1986) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209064 · Cited by 932
Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research
Kalyanaram, G., & Winer, R. S. (1995) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.14.3.g161 · Cited by 791
Cognitive arithmetic: A review of data and theory
Ashcraft, M. H. (1992) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90051-i · Cited by 756
A Comparative Analysis of Reference Price Models
Briesch, R. A., Krishnamurthi, L., Mazumdar, T., & Raj, S. P. (1997) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209505 · Cited by 475
An Empirical Analysis of Latitude of Price Acceptance in Consumer Package Goods
Kalyanaram, G., & Little, J. D. C. (1994) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209407 · Cited by 447
Cited by
Koschmann, A., & Isaac, M. S. (2018) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2018.08.001 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Vanhuele, M., & Drèze, X.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-10
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 72-85
- ISSN
- 0022-2429 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7185
- OpenAlex
- W2081916225
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 26.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measuring the Price Knowledge Shoppers Bring to the Store. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1509/jmkg.66.4.72.18516
- The paper
- Vanhuele, M., & Drèze, X. (2002). Measuring the Price Knowledge Shoppers Bring to the Store. Journal of Marketing. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.4.72.18516
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.