The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text‐Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader‐Response Analyses
Abstract
Text Interpretations, two experiments, and a set of reader-response interviews examine the impact of stylistic elements in advertising that form visual rhetorical figures parallel to those found in language. The visual figures examined here—rhyme, antithesis, metaphor, and pun—produced more elaboration and led to a more favorable attitude toward the ad, without being any more difficult to comprehend. Interviews confirmed that several of the meanings generated by informants corresponded to those produced by an a priori text-interpretive analysis of the ads. However, all of these effects diminished or disappeared for the visual tropes (metaphor and pun) in the case of individuals who lacked the cultural competency required to adequately appreciate the contemporary American ads on which the studies are based. Results are discussed in terms of the power of rhetorical theory and cultural competency theory (Scott 1994a) for illuminating the role played by visual elements in advertising. Overall, the project demonstrates the advantages of investigating visual persuasion via an integration of multiple research traditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Thinking into it: Consumer Interpretation of Complex Advertising Images
Phillips, B. J. (1997) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.1080/00913367.1997.10673524 · Cited by 171
Cited by
Consumer Culture Theory (CCT): Twenty Years of Research
Arnould, E. J., & Thompson, C. J. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/426626 · Cited by 3,677
Personification in Advertising
Delbaere, M., McQuarrie, E. F., & Phillips, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Advertising · doi:10.2753/joa0091-3367400108 · Cited by 390
Self-citationMirrors of Masculinity: Representation and Identity in Advertising Images
Schroeder, J. E., & Zwick, D. (2004) · Consumption Markets & Culture · doi:10.1080/1025386042000212383 · Cited by 383
Narrative and Persuasion in Fashion Advertising
Phillips, B. J., & McQuarrie, E. F. (2010) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/653087 · Cited by 350
Self-citationGretry, A., Horváth, C., Belei, N., & van Riel, A. C. R. (2017) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.01.012 · Cited by 229
Metadata
- Authors
- McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G.
- Venue
- Journal of Consumer Research
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-54
- ISSN
- 0093-5301 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5277
- OpenAlex
- W2136154044
- Cited by
- 656
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 70.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text‐Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader‐Response Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/209549
- The paper
- McQuarrie, E. F., & Mick, D. G. (1999). Visual Rhetoric in Advertising: Text‐Interpretive, Experimental, and Reader‐Response Analyses. Journal of Consumer Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/209549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.