Cited by 1,495Political Economy and MarxismMarxism and Critical TheoryContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Marx's Theory of Metabolic Rift: Classical Foundations for Environmental Sociology

Foster, John Bellamy·1999·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

This article addresses a paradox: on the one hand, environmental sociology, as currently developed, is closely associated with the thesis that the classical sociological tradition is devoid of systematic insights into environmental problems; on the other hand, evidence of crucial classical contributions in this area, particularly in Marx, but also in Weber, Durkheim, and others, is too abundant to be convincingly denied. The nature of this paradox, its origins, and the means of transcending it are illustrated primarily through an analysis of Marx's theory of metabolic rift, which, it is contended, offers important classical foundations for environmental sociology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/210315

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 84 references

9 of the 84 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Beck, Ulrich. 1995. Ecological Enlightenment. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.
  2. Benton Ted, 1989, New Left Review, 178, 51
  3. Benton, Ted, and Michael Redclift. 1994. "Introduction." Pp. 1-27 in Social Theory and the Global Environment, edited by Michael Redclift and Ted Benton. New York: Routledge.
  4. Carey, Henry. 1858. Letters to the President on the Foreign and Domestic Policy of the Union. Philadelphia: M. Polock.
  5. - (1858-59) 1867. Principles of Social Science, vol. 2. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.
  6. Catton, William. 1982. Overshoot. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  7. Catton William, 1978, American Sociologist, 13, 41
  8. Cohen, Stephen. 1980. Bukharin and the Bolshevik Revolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  9. Darwin, Charles. (1859) 1968. The Origin of Species. Middlesex: Penguin.
  10. - 1996. Reconstructing Nature. New York: Routledge.
  11. Dryzek, John. 1997. The Politics of the Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  12. Dunlap Riley, 1983, Rural Sociology, 48, 201
  13. Durkheim, E'mile, and Marcel Mauss. 1963. Primitive Classification. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. Eckersley, Robyn. 1992. Environmentalism and Political Theory. New York: State University of New York Press.
  15. Ferkiss, Victor. 1993. Nature, Technology and Society. New York: New York University Press.
  16. Giradet Herbert, 1997, Architectural Design, 67, 9
  17. Hayward, Tim. 1994. Ecological Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: Polity.
  18. Jacobs, Michael. 1994. "The Limits to Neoclassicism." Pp. 67-91 in Social Theory and the Environment, edited by Michael Redclift and Ted Benton. New York: Routledge.
  19. Komarov, V. L. 1935. "Marx and Engels on Biology." Pp. 190-234 in Marxism and Modern Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
  20. Lenin, V. I. 1961. Collected Works, vol. 5. Edited by Victor Jerome. Moscow: Progress.
  21. - 1865. Letters on the Subject of the Utilization of the Metropolitan Sewage. London: W. H. Collingridge.
  22. Martinez-Alier, Juan. 1987. Ecological Economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  23. - (1867) 1976. Capital, vol. 1. New York: Vintage.
  24. - (1865-70) 1978. Capital, vol. 2. New York: Vintage.
  25. - (1863-65) 1981. Capital, vol. 3. New York: Vintage.
  26. Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. (1848) 1967. The Communist Manifesto. New York: Monthly Review.
  27. McConnell, Campbell. 1987. Economics. New York: McGraw Hill.
  28. - 1993. Regarding Nature. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  29. Norgaard, Richard. 1994. Development Betrayed. New York: Routledge.
  30. Perelman Michael, 1988, Environment, Technology and Society, 51, 15
  31. Redclift, Michael, and Graham Woodgate. 1994. "Sociology and the Environment." Pp. 51-66 in Social Theory and the Global Environment, vol. 1. Edited by Michael Redclift and Ted Benton. New York: Routledge.
  32. Schnaiberg, Allen. 1980. The Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  33. Shanin, Teodor. 1983. Late Marx and the Russian Road. New York: Monthly Review.
  34. 10.2307/2592204 · DOI
  35. Uranovsky, Y. M. 1935. "Marxism and Natural Science." Pp. 136-74 in Marxism and Modern Thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
  36. Wolman Abel, 1965, Scientific American, 213, 179

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,491

Metadata

Authors
Foster, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Foster, John Bellamy
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1999-09
Volume
105
Issue
2
Pages
366-405
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W2006759735
Cited by
1,495
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 170 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 133 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 82 · 2021: 116 · 2020: 98 · 2019: 77 · 2018: 81 · 2017: 56 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 67 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 34
FWCI
33.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Economy and Marxism
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Marxism and Critical Theory
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
metabolic rift, Karl Marx, environmental sociology, classical sociology, Max Weber, Émile Durkheim, environmental problems, history of environmental thought

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review