The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Working-Class Power, Capitalist-Class Interests, and Class Compromise
Open accessAbstract
This article proposes a general theoretical framework for understanding the concept of "class compromise" in terms of a "reverse-J" model of the relationship between the associational power of workers and the interests of capitalists: increases in working-class power adversely affect capitalist-class interests until such power crosses some intermediate threshold beyond which further increases in working-class power are potentially beneficial to capitalists' interests. This article argues that the reverse-J curve is itself the result of two distinct kinds of effects of workers' power on capitalists' interests: one, a negative effect, in which workers' power undermines the capacity of capitalists to unilaterally make various kinds of decisions, and the second, a positive effect, in which workers' power helps capitalists solve the various kinds of collective action problems they face.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Good Gig, Bad Gig: Autonomy and Algorithmic Control in the Global Gig Economy
Wood, A. J., Graham, M., Lehdonvirta, V., & Hjorth, I. (2019) · Work, Employment and Society · doi:10.1177/0950017018785616 · Cited by 2,209
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2021) · Competition & Change · doi:10.1177/1024529420914473 · Cited by 429
Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2020) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x19894584 · Cited by 350
Good Times, Bad Times: Postwar Labor’s Share of National Income in Capitalist Democracies
Kristal, T. (2010) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122410382640 · Cited by 228
Determinants of labour’s income share in the era of financialisation
Dünhaupt, P. (2017) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bew023 · Cited by 133
Corporate social responsibility and labour agency: the case of Nike in Pakistan
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Coe, N. M. (2015) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbt041 · Cited by 87
The employer response to the guaranteed annual income
Calnitsky, D. (2020) · Socio-Economic Review · doi:10.1093/ser/mwy009 · Cited by 69
Hajat, A., Andrea, S. B., Oddo, V. M., Winkler, M. R., & Ahonen, E. Q. (2024) · Annual Review of Public Health · doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071321-042437 · Cited by 60
Hastings, T. (2019) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbz010 · Cited by 28
Labor organizing at chokepoints along Amazon’s supply chain: Locating geo-strategic nodes
Potiker, S. L., Smith, D. A., Ciccantell, P. S., Sowers, E., & McKenzie, L. (2024) · Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space · doi:10.1177/0308518x241228991 · Cited by 11
Legitimacy, voice and power in ride hailing labour movements in Kenya
Zollmann, J. (2025) · New Technology, Work and Employment · doi:10.1111/ntwe.12307 · Cited by 4
Anwar, M. A. (2025) · Platforms & Society · doi:10.1177/29768624251369063 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Wright, E. O.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 957-1002
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2055321771
- Cited by
- 1,087
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.