Cited by 87Global trade, sustainability, and social impactSoftware Engineering and Design PatternsCorporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Corporate social responsibility and labour agency: the case of Nike in Pakistan

Lund-Thomsen, Peter, Coe, Neil M.·2015·Journal of Economic Geography

Abstract

This article examines the circumstances under which corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives facilitate and/or constrain labour agency in global production networks (GPNs). Using a case study of Nike’s CSR approach in the football manufacturing industry of Pakistan, we explore the extent to which the measures advocated in a new, emerging policy paradigm on CSR in GPNs enabled labour agency at Nike’s main football supplier factory in Pakistan. We argue that while such CSR policies can create enhanced space for labour agency, that potential agency is also shaped (i) by wider economic forces within the global economy and (ii) relationships with local/national actors and regulatory frameworks. Understanding the intersection of these dimensions becomes vital to interpreting the potential for, and activation of, labour agency within CSR-influenced GPNs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jeg/lbt041

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Control decisions are impacted by host countries' regulatory environments, particularly when national political institutions create pressure for local content on MNEs trying to gain access to large downstream markets in emerging economies.

    “To some extent, control decisions are impacted by host countries' regulatory environments, particularly when national political institutions create pressure for local content on MNEs that are trying to gain access to large downstream markets in Global value chains emerging economies (Lund-Thomsen & Coe, 2015;Morris & Staritz, 2014;Sturgeon, Van Biesebroeck, & Gereffi, 2008).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Lund-Thomsen & Coe, 2015

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 87

Authors
Lund-Thomsen, P., & Coe, N. M.
Affiliations
National University of Singapore (SG)
Venue
Journal of Economic Geography
Published
2013-12-16
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
275-296
ISSN
  • 1468-2702 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2710
OpenAlex
W2139889108
Cited by
87
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4
FWCI
15.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Economic Geography (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Samfund og Erhverv, Det Frie Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Development › Software Engineering and Design Patterns
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Keywords
corporate social responsibility, labour agency, global production networks, Nike, footwear industry, Pakistan, labor market regulation, global economy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review