The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Substantive Theory and Statistical Interaction: Five Models
Abstract
For a series of theoretical models involving two independent interval-scale variables acting together to produce a joint causal effect, different modes of analysis are described. In each case statistical interaction is involved, but the form of this interation differs with each model. Methods for deriving appropriate interaction terms are given. These models provide a flexibility for statistical analyses appropriate to a broader range of theories than can be treated well by conventional regression procedures. If, as seems likely, theoretical propositions are often stated in empirical research in a form appropriate to additive multiple regression, these methods suggest that such propositions might be reexamined and reformulated. It is possible that the methods have particular relevance for some aspects of functional, equilibrium, balance, and conflict theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0048153 · Cited by 1,700
Cited by
Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
Karasek, R. A. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392498 · Cited by 12,597
Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments
Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250100107 · Cited by 5,981
Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995) · Journal of Business Venturing · doi:10.1016/0883-9026(94)00004-e · Cited by 2,259
Transcending General Linear Reality
Abbott, A. (1988) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.2307/202114 · Cited by 716
The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory
Hartmann, F. G. H. (2000) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(98)00036-1 · Cited by 324
The moderating influence of service use on negative caregiving consequences
Bass, D. M., Noelker, L. S., & Rechlin, L. R. (1996) · The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/51b.3.s121 · Cited by 160
The Buffering Effect of a Computer Support Network on Caregiver Strain
Bass, D. M., Mcclendon, M. J., Brennan, P. F., & Mccarthy, C. (1998) · Journal of Aging and Health · doi:10.1177/089826439801000102 · Cited by 115
Involvement in knowledge-acquisition activities by venture team members and venture performance
Chandler, G. N., & Lyon, D. W. (2009) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00317.x · Cited by 98
Relating alternative forms of contingency fit to the appropriate methods to test them
Burkert, M., Davila, A., Mehta, K., & Oyon, D. (2014) · Management Accounting Research · doi:10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.008 · Cited by 87
Positive Life Events and Depressive Symptoms in Older Adults
Krause, N. (1988) · Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1080/08964289.1988.9935131 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Southwood, K. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1978-03
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1154-1203
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2015767106
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
