The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking
Abstract
Voluntary risk taking is an activity that attracts a sizable number of people in American society but has been largely ignored by sociologists. A literature review is presented that points to a number of shortcomings in existing studies, most of which are associated with the psychological reductionism that predominates in this area of study. An effort is made to provide a sociological account of voluntary risk taking by (1) introducing a new classifyin concept- edgework-based on numerous themes emerging from primary and secondary data on risk taking and (2) explaining edgework in terms of the newly emerging social psychological perspective produced from the synthesis of the Marxian and Meadian frameworks. The concept of edgework highlights the most sociologically relevant features of voluntary risk taking, while the connections between various aspects of risk-taking behaviour and structural characteristic of modern American society at both the micro and macro levels. This approach ties together such factors as political economic variables, at one end of the continuum, and individual sensations and feelings, at the other end.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Edgework Theory and Social Disorganisation Theory provide insight into the social and psychological dynamics that foster deviant behaviour in VR, including the thrill of pushing boundaries and the absence of cohesive societal norms.
“Other frameworks, such as Edgework Theory (Lyng, 1990) and Social Disorganisation Theory (Shaw & McKay, 1942), provide insight into the social and psychological dynamics that foster deviant behaviour in VR, including the thrill of pushing boundaries and the absence of cohesive societal norms.”
From Virtual Reality Risks for Children in the Metaverse: An Examination through Criminological Perspectives (2026) · cites this paper as Lyng, 1990
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 1,238
Metadata
- Authors
- Lyng, S.
- Corresponding author
- Lyng, Stephen
- ORCID
- Lyng, Stephen
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 851-886
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W1994480952
- Cited by
- 1,238
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
- Keywords
- edgework, voluntary risk-taking, risk-taking, psychological reductionism, American society
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review