Cited by 1,238Adventure Sports and Sensation SeekingCrime, Deviance, and Social ControlContemporary Sociological Theory and Practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.

Edgework: A Social Psychological Analysis of Voluntary Risk Taking

Lyng, Stephen·1990·American Journal of Sociology

Abstract

Voluntary risk taking is an activity that attracts a sizable number of people in American society but has been largely ignored by sociologists. A literature review is presented that points to a number of shortcomings in existing studies, most of which are associated with the psychological reductionism that predominates in this area of study. An effort is made to provide a sociological account of voluntary risk taking by (1) introducing a new classifyin concept- edgework-based on numerous themes emerging from primary and secondary data on risk taking and (2) explaining edgework in terms of the newly emerging social psychological perspective produced from the synthesis of the Marxian and Meadian frameworks. The concept of edgework highlights the most sociologically relevant features of voluntary risk taking, while the connections between various aspects of risk-taking behaviour and structural characteristic of modern American society at both the micro and macro levels. This approach ties together such factors as political economic variables, at one end of the continuum, and individual sensations and feelings, at the other end.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/229379

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Edgework Theory and Social Disorganisation Theory provide insight into the social and psychological dynamics that foster deviant behaviour in VR, including the thrill of pushing boundaries and the absence of cohesive societal norms.

    “Other frameworks, such as Edgework Theory (Lyng, 1990) and Social Disorganisation Theory (Shaw & McKay, 1942), provide insight into the social and psychological dynamics that foster deviant behaviour in VR, including the thrill of pushing boundaries and the absence of cohesive societal norms.”

Citations

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 43 · Cited by 1,238

Metadata

Authors
Lyng, S.
Corresponding author
Lyng, Stephen
Venue
American Journal of Sociology
Published
1990-01
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
851-886
ISSN
  • 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5390
OpenAlex
W1994480952
Cited by
1,238
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 37 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 63 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 60 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 57 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 56
FWCI
8.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Sociology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice
Keywords
edgework, voluntary risk-taking, risk-taking, psychological reductionism, American society

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review