The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do
Abstract
It is reasonable to suppose that individuals use the number of friends that their friends have as one basis for determining whether they, themselves, have an adequate number of friends. This article shows that, if individuals compare themselves with their friends, it is likely that most of them will feel relatively inadequate. Data on friendship drawn from James Coleman's (1961) classic study The Adolescent Society are used to illustratite the phenomenon that most people have fewer friends have. The logic underlying the phenomenon is mathematically explored, showing that the mean number of friends of friends is always greater than the mean number of friends of individuals. Further analysis shows that the proportion of individuals who have fewer friends than the mean number of friends their own friends have is affected by the exact arrangement fo friendships in a social network. This disproportionate experiencing of friends with many friends is related to a set of abstractly similar "class size paradoxes" that includes such diverse phenomena as the tendencies for college students to experience the mean class size as larger than it actually is and for people to experience beaches and parks as more crowded than they usually are.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Contagion in financial networks
Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2009.0410 · Cited by 1,163
Watts, D. J. (2004) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.30.020404.104342 · Cited by 1,163
Efficient Immunization Strategies for Computer Networks and Populations
Cohen, R., Havlin, S., & ben-Avraham, D. (2003) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.247901 · Cited by 1,162
Effects of missing data in social networks
Kossinets, G. (2006) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2005.07.002 · Cited by 926
Statistical physics of vaccination
Wang, Z., Bauch, C. T., Bhattacharyya, S., d'Onofrio, A., Manfredi, P., Perc, M., Perra, N., Salathé, M., & Zhao, D. (2016) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.10.006 · Cited by 872
Metadata
- Authors
- Feld, S. L.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-05
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1464-1477
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2084862036
- Cited by
- 571
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/229693
- The paper
- Feld, S. L. (1991). Why Your Friends Have More Friends Than You Do. American Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1086/229693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.