The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Accounting for Rationality: Double-Entry Bookkeeping and the Rhetoric of Economic Rationality
Abstract
This article addresses claims made by Weber, Schumpeter, and Sombart concerning the importance of double-entry bookkeeping. They argue that accounting played a key technical role in enhancing rationality and furthering the development of capitalism methods of production. The history of accounting methods and practices from the Middle Ages to the 19th century is surveyed in order to evaluate these arguments. Two important dimensions of accounting are discussed: the rhetorical and the technical. The argument is that, as rethoric, accounting must be understood as an attempt to convince some audience of the legitimacy of business ventures. Goody's analysis of writing and literacy is applied to the development of accounting as a technique. As a practical method, double-entry bookkeeping appears to have increased "rationality," but the rhetorical side of double entry is also critical. The conclusion is that the significance of double-entry bookkeeping can be appreciated only if its rhetorical and technical aspects are considered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
MacKenzie, D., & Millo, Y. (2003) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/374404 · Cited by 1,464
Peripheral Vision: Economic Markets as Calculative Collective Devices
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840605056393 · Cited by 1,378
Espeland, W. N., & Stevens, M. L. (2008) · European Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1017/s0003975609000150 · Cited by 1,265
Self-citationA world of standards but not a standard world: Toward a sociology of standards and standardization
Timmermans, S., & Epstein, S. (2010) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102629 · Cited by 1,226
Accounting, organizing, and economizing: connecting accounting research and organization theory
Miller, P., & Power, M. (2013) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2013.783668 · Cited by 588
Bookkeeping, accounting, calculative practice: the sociological suspense of calculation
Vollmer, H. (2003) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1006/cpac.2002.0528 · Cited by 125
Schneiberg, M., & Berk, G. (2010) · Research in the Sociology of Organizations · doi:10.1108/s0733-558x(2010)0000031011 · Cited by 46
Pflueger, D., Kornberger, M., & Mouritsen, J. (2022) · European Accounting Review · doi:10.1080/09638180.2022.2147973 · Cited by 26
Outlining Traceability: A Principle for Operationalizing Accountability in Computing Systems
Kroll, J. A. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445937 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Carruthers, B. G., & Espeland, W. N.
- Venue
- American Journal of Sociology
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1991-07
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-69
- ISSN
- 0002-9602 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5390
- OpenAlex
- W2004641290
- Cited by
- 629
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.