The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Possibility of Practical Reason
Open accessAbstract
This principle is meant to apply only to complete sets of reasons, not to reasons taken individually.That is, if a particular consideration counts as a reason only in the context of a larger set or series of considerations, then it need not be capable of swaying the agent unless it is considered in that context.The assumption that 'reasons' denotes complete sets of reasons will be in force throughout the following discussion.I shall also rely on the success-grammar of the word 'considerations': considerations are, by implication, true considerations-or, as I shall sometimes call them, facts.2. The last clause is meant to account for cases like this: "It may be true of me that were the aroma of fresh apple pie to waft past my nose I would be moved to discover its source and perhaps to try to wangle a piece.It does not follow from this, however, that before I smell the pie I desire to eat it or to eat anything at all" (Stephen L. Darwall, Impartial Reason [Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1983], p. 40).Here apple pie is something that the agent doesn't yet want but will want once he considers its attainability, and so considerations about how to obtain it are capable of influencing Ethics 106 (
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2. Understanding others through primary interaction and narrative practice
Gallagher, S., & Hutto, D. D. (2008) · Converging Evidence in Language and Communication Research · doi:10.1075/celcr.12.04gal · Cited by 540
Wedgwood, R. (2002) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/1468-0068.36.s16.10 · Cited by 279
Sauer, H. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108529181 · Cited by 72
Self-exposure and exposure of the self: informational privacy and the presentation of identity
Shoemaker, D. W. (2010) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9186-x · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Velleman, J. D.
- Venue
- Ethics
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 694-726
- ISSN
- 0014-1704 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-297X
- OpenAlex
- W2120686724
- Cited by
- 734
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Possibility of Practical Reason. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/233669
- The paper
- Velleman, J. D. (1996). The Possibility of Practical Reason. Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1086/233669
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.