The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Classical Macroeconometric Model for the United States
Abstract
A statistical definition of the natural unemployment rate hypothesis is advanced and tested. A particular illustrative structural macroeconomic model satisfying the definition is set forth and estimated. The model has "classical" policy implications, implying a number of neutrality propositions asserting the invariance of the conditional means of real variables with respect to the feedback rule for the money supply. The aim is to test how emphatically the data reject a model incorporating rather severe classical hypotheses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Investigating Causal Relations by Econometric Models and Cross-Spectral Methods
Granger, C. W. J. (2010) · Essays in Econometrics · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511753978.002 · Cited by 4,762
"Rational" Expectations, the Optimal Monetary Instrument, and the Optimal Money Supply Rule
Sargent, T. J., & Wallace, N. (1975) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/260321 · Cited by 2,168
Self-citationOptimal Choice of Monetary Policy Instruments in a Simple Stochastic Macro Model
Poole, W. (1970) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1883009 · Cited by 1,297
Tobin, J. G. (1995) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_12 · Cited by 786
Rational Expectations, the Real Rate of Interest, and the Natural Rate of Unemployment
Sargent, T. J., Fand, D. I., & Goldfeld, S. M. (1973) · Brookings Papers on Economic Activity · doi:10.2307/2534097 · Cited by 532
Self-citationA Note on the "Accelerationist" Controversy
Sargent, T. J. (1971) · Journal of money credit and banking · doi:10.2307/1991369 · Cited by 271
Self-citationThe Role of Approximate Prior Restrictions in Distributed Lag Estimation
Sims, C. A. (1972) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1972.10481221 · Cited by 149
Nonlinear Estimation of Aggregate Production Functions
Bodkin, R. G., & Klein, L. R. (1967) · The Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.2307/1937881 · Cited by 90
Cited by
Non-Monetary Effects of the Financial Crisis in the Propagation of the Great Depression
Bernanke, B. (1983) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w1054 · Cited by 2,173
Sticky Prices in the United States
Rotemberg, J. J. (1982) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/261117 · Cited by 1,899
Granger, C. W. J. (1980) · Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control · doi:10.1016/0165-1889(80)90069-x · Cited by 1,746
Comparing alternative tests of causality in temporal systems
Geweke, J., Meese, R., & Dent, W. (1983) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(83)90012-x · Cited by 630
Pierce, D. A., & Haugh, L. D. (1977) · Journal of Econometrics · doi:10.1016/0304-4076(77)90039-2 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- Sargent, T. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1976-04
- Volume
- 84
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-237
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2059615788
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 64.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Classical Macroeconometric Model for the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/260429
- The paper
- Sargent, T. J. (1976). A Classical Macroeconometric Model for the United States. Journal of Political Economy. https://doi.org/10.1086/260429
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
