The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An economic theory of self-control.
Abstract
The concept of self-control is incorporated in a theory of individual intertemporal choice by modeling the individual as an organization. The individual at a point in time is assumed to be both a farsighted planner and a myopic doer. The resulting conflict is seen to be fundamentally similar to the agency conflict between the owners and managers of a firm. Both individuals and firms use the same techniques to mitigate the problems which the conflicts create. This paper stresses the implications of this agency model and discusses as applications the effect of pensions on saving, saving and the timing of income flows, and individual discount rates.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“self-control can also be hampered by situational factors, especially when the costs of indulging in temptation are blurred, and rational and slow decision making is prevented (Shefrin and Thaler, 1981; Fishbach and Zhang, 2008).”
From Motivational and Affective Factors Underlying Consumer Dropout and Transactional Success in eCommerce: An Overview (2020) · cites this paper as Shefrin and Thaler, 1981
Citations
Cites
Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization
Strotz, R. H. (1955) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2295722 · Cited by 2,834
Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.
Ainslie, G. (1975) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0076860 · Cited by 2,708
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review
Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/002205102320161311 · Cited by 6,106
Toward a positive theory of consumer choice
Thaler, R. H. (1980) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/0167-2681(80)90051-7 · Cited by 5,796
Self-citationCoats, A. (1891) · doi:10.1111/j.1475-4932.1945.tb01151.x · Cited by 5,494
Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice
Thaler, R. H. (2008) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1070.0330 · Cited by 3,477
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Thaler, R. H., & Shefrin, H. M.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Santa Clara University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1981-04
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 392-406
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W1997680043
- Cited by
- 2,203
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 50 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 112 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 120 · 2020: 108 · 2019: 128 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 103 · 2016: 90 · 2015: 76 · 2014: 82 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 76
- FWCI
- 99.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Theory and Institutions
- Keywords
- self-control, intertemporal choice, agency theory, principal-agent problem, myopic behavior, pensions, savings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review