Cited by 2,708Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control.

Ainslie, George·1975·Psychological Bulletin

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0076860

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ainslie, G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Ainslie, George
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
1975-07
Volume
82
Issue
4
Pages
463-496
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W2006619603
Cited by
2,708
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 54 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 112 · 2021: 110 · 2020: 152 · 2019: 98 · 2018: 121 · 2017: 110 · 2016: 102 · 2015: 127 · 2014: 109 · 2013: 126 · 2012: 127
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
impulsivity, impulse control, behavioral theory, reward
MeSH terms
Behavior Therapy, Behaviorism, Choice Behavior, Cues, Economics, Humans, Imitative Behavior, Impulsive Behavior, Motivation, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychology, Clinical, Psychology, Social, Punishment, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review