Heterogeneity, Aggregation, and Market Wage Functions: An Empirical Model of Self-Selection in the Labor Market
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The identification problem deepens when costs are allowed to be psychic costs and one attempts to separate productivity traits from preference traits.
“The identification problem deepens when we allow the costs to be psychic costs as in Heckman and Sedlacek [1985], Cunha, Heckman and Navarro [2005], or Heckman, Stixrud and Urzua [2006], and attempt to separate out productivity traits from preference traits.”
From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Heckman and Sedlacek [1985]
Cites
Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error
Heckman, J. J. (1979) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912352 · Cited by 28,779 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings
Acemoglu, D., & Autor, D. (2011) · Handbook of Labor Economics · doi:10.1016/s0169-7218(11)02410-5 · Cited by 3,799 · see citing works
Models for Sample Selection Bias
Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1992) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001551 · Cited by 812 · see citing works
Personality Psychology and Economics
Almlund, M., Duckworth, A. L., Heckman, J., & Kautz, T. (2011) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w16822 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Heckman, J. J., & Sedlacek, G.
- ORCID
- Heckman, James J.
- Venue
- Journal of Political Economy
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-12
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1077-1125
- ISSN
- 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-534X
- OpenAlex
- W2084538591
- Cited by
- 610
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 20.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Keywords
- worker heterogeneity, wage functions, labor supply, wage determination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
