Cited by 37Marine and fisheries researchIndigenous Studies and EcologySocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

Bioeconomics and the bowhead whale

Conrad, Jon M.·1989·Journal of Political Economy

Abstract

In the mid-1970s the International Whaling Commission concluded that the increased harvest by Alaskan Eskimos threatened the existence of the bowhead whale, which was slowly recovering from a period of open-access exploitation (1848-1914). This paper briefly discusses the economic history of the bowhead whale fishery in the western Arctic, simulates the population from 1848-1988, and presents a bioeconomic model that may be used to determine optimal Eskimo harvest for alternative rates of discount and weights on the bowhead population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/261637

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conrad, J. M.
Corresponding author
Conrad, Jon M.
Venue
Journal of Political Economy
Published
1989-08
Volume
97
Issue
4
Pages
974-987
ISSN
  • 0022-3808 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-534X
OpenAlex
W2596160342
Cited by
37
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Political Economy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Indigenous Studies and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
bowhead whale, whaling, bioeconomics, Alaska Natives, International Whaling Commission, population dynamics, optimal harvesting, Western Arctic, fisheries history

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review