Cited by 303Opinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationPsychology of Social Influence

Behavioral Support for Opinion Change

Festinger, Leon·1964·Public Opinion Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/267263

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Behavior and attitudes are mutually reinforcing in general and for deviant behavior in particular.

    “To the extent that behavior and attitudes are mutually reinforcing in general (e.g., Bem 1970;Festinger 1964), and for deviant behavior in particular (e.g., Warr and Stafford 1991), a full picture of the role of religion in controlling crime and deviance needs to assess religion's affect on both attitudes and behavior.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Festinger, L.
Venue
Public Opinion Quarterly
Published
1964
Volume
28
Issue
3
Pages
404
ISSN
0033-362X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036793699
Cited by
303
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 53 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
17.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Opinion Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Psychology of Social Influence
Keywords
opinion change, behavioral support, persuasion, attitude change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review