The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Analysis of a Case of Continuous Variation in Drosophila by a Study of Its Linkage Relations
Abstract
The character under consideration is that of Beaded wings in Drosophila ampelophila. All gradations of form between that of normal wings (Fig. 1) and those shown in Figs. 2 to 12 occur in the stock bottles, though certain selected strains of the stock give no normalwinged offspring. When a Beaded fly is mated to a fly of a stock not carrying genes for Beadedness in its germ plasma varying percentage of the F1 offspring is Beaded. If the male parent is Beaded the majority of the Beaded offspring are usually females; and if the female parent is Beaded, the majority of the Beaded offspring are usually males. A female Beaded fly however gives a larger percentage of Beaded daughters than does a male Beaded fly. This phenomenon is repeated from generation to generation, no matter whether a given Beaded fly has come from a male or female Beaded parent, and this shows that the phenomenon is not caused by a sex-linked gene. This phenomenon is not caused by non-disjunction of a sex-linked gene, for tests of both the Beaded and Wild stocks showed non-disjunction to be a rare phenomenon. The only explanation suggested was that the male offspring were somewhat influenced to or away from Beadedness by the nature of the cytoplasm that was brought in with the egg, while females were not readily influenced in this way. A study of the F2 generation shows that the majority of the normal F1 offspring differ from the majority of the Beaded F1 offspring genetically in that normals give fewer Beaded offspring in the F2 generation than do the Beaded flies. Beaded wings showed no linkage to any sex-linked character. Approximately one half of the flies of the F1 generation of a cross between Beaded flies and flies with characters whose genes were in the second chromosome, showed linkage in the following generation to second chromosome characters, while one half of the flies did not show such linkage. The cases where linkage did not occur gave a slightly lower percentage of Beaded offspring than did those where linkage was present. An explanation of these phenomena is sought in the suggestion that there was in the second chromosome a gene, here called 1, that was recessive but that in the heterozygous condition intensified the dominance of another gene, called B', which was not in the second chromosome. This gene 1 behaves as a lethal factor preventing the development of any fly that carries it in a homozygous condition. All of the F1 offspring of the crosses of Beaded flies by flies with characters caused by genes in the third chromosome showed linkage in the following generation between Beaded wings and the third chromosome characters. This was taken to signify that there was in the third chromosome a non-lethal gene concerned in the development of Beaded wings. This gene was called B'. This gene was shown to be the essential germinal factor in the production of Beaded wings. It is sometimes dominant and sometimes recessive. The determination as to whether B' should be dominant or recessive seems to lie in several possibilities: 1st, the nature of the egg cytoplasm; 2d, the presence or absence of the gene 1; 3d, the nature of the environmental conditions. With reference to environmental conditions, it was shown that a larger percentage of the F, generation had Beaded wings when the culture was wet than when it was dry; and more when the food was alkaline than when it was acid. No other environmental factors were discovered which influenced the production of Beaded wings. Selection of more or less extreme Beaded flies very quickly moves the average Beadedness of the offspring in the direction of the selection, but this selection apparently becomes further ineffective in a very few generations. Mutation is of very frequent occurrence in the Beaded stock and the new mutants obtained have in most cases shown themselves to be produced under the influence of one normally Mendelizing gene.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The mechanism of Mendelian heredity
Morgan, T. H. (1915) · H. Holt eBooks · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.6001 · Cited by 426
Modifier genes and the plasticity of genetic networks in mice
Hamilton, B. A., & Yu, B. D. (2012) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1002644 · Cited by 78
Oscillatory Behaviors of microRNA Networks: Emerging Roles in Retinal Development
Fishman, E. S., Han, J. S., & La Torre, A. (2022) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2022.831750 · Cited by 16
Miller, D. E., Kahsai, L., Buddika, K., Dixon, M. J., Kim, B. Y., Calvi, B. R., Sokol, N. S., Hawley, R. S., & Cook, K. R. (2020) · G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.120.401559 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Dexter, J. S.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1914-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 576
- Pages
- 712-758
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2026140964
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Analysis of a Case of Continuous Variation in Drosophila by a Study of Its Linkage Relations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/279446
- The paper
- Dexter, J. S. (1914). The Analysis of a Case of Continuous Variation in Drosophila by a Study of Its Linkage Relations. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/279446
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.