The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Mechanism of Crossing-Over
Open accessAbstract
As soon as it seemed probable that the factors were linked in line, and that the crossing-over was the actual method of interchange, it became of interest to discover and to analyze the precise mode of incidence of the interchange. The questions suggested themselves, for example, what was the total frequency of crossing-over, did any factors separate more often than they remained together, how often did crossing-over occur at two points simultaneously, and was there any tendency, in such cases, for the two points of crossing-over to be a definite distance apart, or in definite positions, etc. For answers to these questions might throw light on the mechanism of crossing-over, what cytological phenomena it was connected with, and what stage in synapsis it occurred at. With these points in view the author calculated the linkage relations that would result on several possible schemes of interchange. The simplest possibility was that the chromosomes always twisted in loops of fixed length, though not of fixed position, and always underwent breakage, with recombination of homologous strands (i. e., crossed-over in the technical sense), at each place that the strands crossed one another. In such a case there would always be a definite distance between one point of crossing-over and another; moreover, all factors which were separated by a distance great enough for double crossing-over to occur between them, i. e., by the length of at least one loop, must always have either double or single (or multiple) crossing-over between them. Sturtevant's data, however, showed that this was
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nasmyth, K. (2001) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.35.102401.091334 · Cited by 805
Santos, T. D. L., Hunter, N., Lee, C., Larkin, B., Loidl, J., & Hollingsworth, N. M. (2003) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/164.1.81 · Cited by 391
c(3)G encodes a Drosophila synaptonemal complex protein
Page, S. L., & Hawley, R. S. (2001) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.935001 · Cited by 305
Crossover interference is abolished in the absence of a synaptonemal complex protein
Sym, M. (1994) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90197-x · Cited by 290
An analysis of the process of structural change in chromosomes ofDrosophila
Muller, H. J. (1940) · Journal of Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf02982481 · Cited by 276
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Muller, H. J.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1916-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 592
- Pages
- 193-221
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2084977549
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 68.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Mechanism of Crossing-Over. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/279534
- The paper
- Muller, H. J. (1916). The Mechanism of Crossing-Over. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/279534
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.