Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 194

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Natural Selection and Mutability

Leigh,, Egbert Giles·1970·The American Naturalist

Abstract

In sexual organisms, alleles increasing the mutation rate of the entire genome are invariably selected against, whereas in asexual organisms such "general mutators" are favored if they adjust the mutation rate closer to an optimum balancing the advantages of responsiveness to environmental change against those of a small mutational load. Unless very small selective pressures are effective, it seems that no mechanisms exist to establish optimum mutation rates in sexual organisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/282663

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 194

Metadata

Authors
Leigh
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1970-05
Volume
104
Issue
937
Pages
301-305
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2057743071
Cited by
194
References
0
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural Selection and Mutability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/282663
The paper
Leigh. (1970). Natural Selection and Mutability. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/282663

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.