The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Switching, Functional Response, and Stability in Predator-Prey Systems
Abstract
We consider a model for the functional response of a predator feeding on two species of prey. We assume that the predator searches randomly, at constant speed, for randomly distributed prey, but that whether it attacks a contacted prey will depend on the species of the prey, the species of the last meal, and the time since the last meal. We establish a formula for the expected time between meals on species 1, and take the functional response on species 1, the number of species 1 eaten per unit time by a single predator, to be the reciprocal of this. The general formulae are somewhat complicated, but if it is assumed that the probability of attack is independent of time, it is possible to obtain a fairly simple expression for functional response. This functional response is not necessarily stabilizing; it will be if there is a sufficiently strong (relative to the handling times) tendency for the predator to be more likely to attack a contacted prey if it is the species that was eaten last. (More detail is given at the end of the section Switching and Stability.) We then consider relative attack rates (still assuming that preference is independent of time since the last meal) first by taking the ratio of the two functional responses (for species 1 and species 2) and next by regarding the sequence of meals as a Markov chain. The answers are the same: the relative attack rate is a function only of relative density, and switching occurs provided only that the product of the probabilities of attacking the same species as last eaten is greater than the product of the probabilities of attacking the other species. It is possible to have switching and yet not have a stabilizing functional response.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of Mathematical Functions
McQuarrie, D. A. (1966) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1972842 · Cited by 40,433
Cited by
Persistence in models of three interacting predator-prey populations
Freedman, H. I., & Waltman, P. (1984) · Mathematical Biosciences · doi:10.1016/0025-5564(84)90032-4 · Cited by 466
Switching and Sigmoid Functional Response Curves by Damselfly Naiads with Alternative Prey Available
Akre, B. G., & Johnson, D. M. (1979) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4191 · Cited by 184
(2009) · doi:10.1016/s1936-7961(08)00217-0 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Oaten, A., & Murdoch, W. W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1975-05
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 967
- Pages
- 299-318
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2042375615
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.