The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Competition, the Fitness of Offspring, and Optimal Clutch Size
Abstract
The theory is developed which relates the optimal division of parental resources among offspring (hence clutch size) to the nature of the intraspecific competitive process, the rate of mortality, and environmental predictability. It assumes that natural selection results in parents adjusting resource investment per offspring in a manner which achieves the highest ratio of offspring fitness per unit of parental resource expended, given a certain relationship between the expected fitness of individual offspring and the investment per offspring. This fitness-resource relation can be constructed from knowledge or models of the frequency distribution of parental resource utilized by individual offspring in the population and from the nature of the competitive process. Model examples are given based on assumptions concerning territorial quality, and on the rules of the game governing contests for resources. These models of interference lead to strong optimization for high expenditures of resource per offspring. The mortality regime, by affecting the severity of competition, should affect the optimal level of allocation and result in selection for birth rates which seem to compensate for mortality. Environmental instability can lead to selection for parental mechanisms which increase growth variation in offspring and achieve a more optimal resource distribution. The theory thus explains how natural selection on individual parents can lead to population control through regulation of birth rates and behavioral mechanisms which seem to prevent overcrowding and starvation. Only fragmentary evidence for testing the theory is available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I
Hamilton, W. D. (1964) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · Cited by 15,725
Cited by
Maternal Effects in Animal Ecology
BERNARDO, J. (1996) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/36.2.83 · Cited by 871
BERNARDO, J. (1996) · American Zoologist · doi:10.1093/icb/36.2.216 · Cited by 746
Egg size and offspring quality: a meta‐analysis in birds
Krist, M. (2011) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00166.x · Cited by 472
Berven, K. A. (1982) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05466.x · Cited by 444
Density cycles and an offspring quantity and quality game driven by natural selection
Sinervo, B., Svensson, E., & Comendant, T. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35023149 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Brockelman, W. Y.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1975-11
- Volume
- 109
- Issue
- 970
- Pages
- 677-699
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2060850618
- Cited by
- 499
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition, the Fitness of Offspring, and Optimal Clutch Size. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283037
- The paper
- Brockelman, W. Y. (1975). Competition, the Fitness of Offspring, and Optimal Clutch Size. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.