The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Succession: An Evolutionary Interpretation
Abstract
An evolutionary interpretation of succession includes the following points. First, in order for a population to be well adapted to a particular set of conditions, it cannot be adapted to many different sets. There is an apparent limit to the width of niche and of habitat that a population can exploit effectively. Selection preserves these unique adaptations and fosters population coupling with the environment. Second, succession provides a complex gradient of physical and biotic environments, analogous to spatial gradients, to which species respond in both ecological and evolutionary time. Selection adjusts the positions of populations on successional gradients in the same way they are adjusted on spatial gradients. Third, the evolutionary strategy, which involves life-cycle length, time of reproduction, reproductive output, and ultimately the degree of recombination, is a basic determinant of species position on both spatial and successional gradients. Fourth, patches of different successional environments are continually changing size, position, and geographic relationship, depending on the disturbance regime. This presents a complex, dynamic pattern of selection pressures in the landscape that allows for the assortment of species into different successional positions. Successional gradients and the evolutionary and functional responses of populations on them are part of a dynamic, regional process rather than a single site pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation
White, P. S. (1979) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02860857 · Cited by 1,120
The Resource-Ratio Hypothesis of Plant Succession
Tilman, D. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284382 · Cited by 1,050
Constraints and Tradeoffs: Toward a Predictive Theory of Competition and Succession
Tilman, D. (1990) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3565355 · Cited by 750
Corenblit, D., Tabacchi, E., Steiger, J., & Gurnell, A. M. (2007) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2007.05.004 · Cited by 721
Patch dynamics and the design of nature reserves
Pickett, S. T. A., & Thompson, J. N. (1978) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/0006-3207(78)90016-2 · Cited by 628
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Pickett, S. T. A.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 971
- Pages
- 107-119
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2018621756
- Cited by
- 326
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Succession: An Evolutionary Interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283051
- The paper
- Pickett, S. T. A. (1976). Succession: An Evolutionary Interpretation. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283051
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.