The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment in Insects
Abstract
One way in which males offset the disparity in relative parental investment is to provide food to the female or offspring in the context of reproduction. In insects, nutritional paternal investment during reproduction may be of three major types: (1) females may receive nourishment from a glandular product of the male; (2) females received nourishment from food captured or collected by the male; and (3) the male himself may be eaten. I have shown elsewhere that the feeding of the female by the male during copulation in insects of the family Bittacidae probably evolved by female preference (i.e., intersexual selection) for males willing and capable of increasing their parental investment during reproduction. I hypothesize that female preference for greater male parental investment may have been the selective context for the evolution of all types of male investment patterns in insects. I also suggest some ways in which my argument might be tested.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Lack, D. (1940) · The Auk · doi:10.2307/4078744 · Cited by 183
Cited by
The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects
Arnqvist, G., & Nilsson, T. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1446 · Cited by 1,545
Evolution and proximate expression of human paternal investment.
Geary, D. C. (2000) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.55 · Cited by 835
The function of nuptial feeding in insects: a review of empirical studies
VAHED, K. (1998) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1997.tb00025.x · Cited by 645
Male Contribution to Egg Production in Butterflies: Evidence for Transfer of Nutrients at Mating
Boggs, C. L., & Gilbert, L. E. (1979) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.206.4414.83 · Cited by 489
The good parent process of sexual selection
Hoelzer, G. A. (1989) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(89)80146-0 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Thornhill, R.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 971
- Pages
- 153-163
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W1993691435
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 19.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment in Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283055
- The paper
- Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment in Insects. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.