Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 331

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment in Insects

Thornhill, Randy·1976·The American Naturalist

Abstract

One way in which males offset the disparity in relative parental investment is to provide food to the female or offspring in the context of reproduction. In insects, nutritional paternal investment during reproduction may be of three major types: (1) females may receive nourishment from a glandular product of the male; (2) females received nourishment from food captured or collected by the male; and (3) the male himself may be eaten. I have shown elsewhere that the feeding of the female by the male during copulation in insects of the family Bittacidae probably evolved by female preference (i.e., intersexual selection) for males willing and capable of increasing their parental investment during reproduction. I hypothesize that female preference for greater male parental investment may have been the selective context for the evolution of all types of male investment patterns in insects. I also suggest some ways in which my argument might be tested.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283055

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Metadata

Authors
Thornhill, R.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1976-01
Volume
110
Issue
971
Pages
153-163
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1993691435
Cited by
331
References
2
FWCI
19.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment in Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283055
The paper
Thornhill, R. (1976). Sexual Selection and Paternal Investment in Insects. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283055

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.