Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 308

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Animal Behavior as a Strategy Optimizer: Evolution of Resource Assessment Strategies and Optimal Emigration Thresholds

Parker, G. A., Stuart, R. A.·1976·The American Naturalist

Abstract

Models are proposed which examine emigration thresholds from resource patches encountered within a given search strategy. With one patch type and no competition during utilization, there is a single optimal investment duration (Iopt) which depends on the gain accumulated during investment in the patch, G(I), and on the mean search cost between patches. Solutions for Iopt depend on the form of G(I); various models are considered which offer diminishing returns with investment. With variation in the value of the patch type encountered, the animal should leave a patch when dG/dI becomes equal to SLmax, the average gain rate for the overall search strategy when the investment in each patch is optimal. For some resources, Iopt may equal 0. Selection should here favor more and more efficient "resource assessment" strategies which ensure the most efficient monitoring of cues correlating with G(I). These are all pure stratengies in relation to particular circumstances. Where there is resource sharing and systems are "ideal free," there is generally no pure strategy which is likely to be evolutionarily stable, and the result will generally be mixed strategies for emigration threshold. For patches offering decreasing returns with investment, the ESS is generally for all individuals to stay until a certain threshold (Il crit. Individuals should then begin to depart at a rate which ensures that the value of staying equal that of leaving. For instance, where nmax competitors all arrive together and resource input gradually decreases, the stable mixed strategy has departure rates ordered so that (l/n)(dG/dI) remains constant as SLmax/nmax until the last individual leaves (In crit). This emigration range (Ilcrit-In crit) and the departure rate can be defined for several situations; there is strong evidence that such strategies exist in natural populations. These models are, however, deterministic; individuals depart as discrete events. This circumstance, especially when the group size is low, can cause certain imbalances which may rely on further mixed strategies (for willingness to leave at a certain group size) for their stability. This effect may have a general application to the problem of emigration from shared resources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283126

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 308

Metadata

Authors
Parker, G. A., & Stuart, R. A.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1976-11
Volume
110
Issue
976
Pages
1055-1076
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W2019084645
Cited by
308
References
1
FWCI
16.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Animal Behavior as a Strategy Optimizer: Evolution of Resource Assessment Strategies and Optimal Emigration Thresholds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283126
The paper
Parker, G. A., & Stuart, R. A. (1976). Animal Behavior as a Strategy Optimizer: Evolution of Resource Assessment Strategies and Optimal Emigration Thresholds. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283126

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.