The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sperm Utilization Strategies in Nonsocial Insects
Abstract
It is postulated that the sperm precedence characteristics of most insect populations have resulted primarily from selection on females (1) to optimize the genetic composition of their progeny; (2) to discourage or encourage multiple matings for reasons other than genetic considerations; (3) to optimize their sperm storage capacity and utilization. In addition, selection on males to maximize egg fertilization by reduced displacement of their sperm and increased displacement of other sperm to the extent that these can be achieved without sacrificing the optimal mating strategy (Parker 1970a) probably has been important in some species. Parker's (1970a) hypothesis that the amount of sperm displacement in a population should stabilize at the value which yields the optimal overall male fertilization rate is accepted as the optimal male strategy; however, it is suggested that females often largely determine, by their behavior and by the structure and functioning of their reproductive tract, the optimal male strategy which provides the optimal sperm displacement pattern for the females. Selection on males independent of selection pressures on females is postulated to exert a major influence on the sperm precedence pattern of a population only when selection on females is relatively lax or nondirectional. Evidence is cited that females often actively regulate sperm movements within their reproductive tracts. Also, they may influence the competitiveness of stored sperm which is nutritionally dependent upon them. A trend is shown toward monogamy or low percent displacement in species with spheroid or ovoid spermathecae contrasting with a high percent displacement in species with elongate or tubular sperm storage organs. Selection for female monogamy is proposed to be based partly upon a greater mean fitness of progeny sired by the first mate, and thus to represent one extreme of a spectrum of sperm utilization strategies. Predation pressure and time budgeting considerations acting on females offer alternative or supplemental explanations for female monogamy. Selection on males probably sometimes has been important in facilitating or antagonizing selection on females for monogamy. Selection pressures proposed as promoting polyandry and sperm displacement in those numerous species which do not require multiple matings for an adequate sperm supply are discussed, and it is concluded that documentation of all these proposals is inadequate to judge their merits. It is emphasized that several types of indirect male parental investments applicable to many species offer testable hypotheses. These include the transfer of nutriments in the ejaculate, and various means of reducing predation of females. The increased genetic diversity gained by sperm displacement may be important in colonizations, promoting utilization of different limited resources within a group of siblings, and reducing undesirable direct competition between relative equals in a brood. Either relatively low or high sperm displacements may provide maximal genetic diversity, depending on the relative frequencies of matings and ovipositions, and whether diversity within an egg batch or within the total progeny is being considered. It is stressed that the three inbred populations cited all have a low percent displacement in contrast to most outbred populations. Further investigations on strongly inbred populations may provide a better estimate of the importance of selection on females for an optimal generic composition in their progeny as a determinant of the sperm precedence characteristics of a population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SPERM COMPETITION AND ITS EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES IN THE INSECTS
PARKER, G. A. (1970) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.1970.tb01176.x · Cited by 3,596
Cited by
Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection
Møller, A. P. (1998) · Sperm Competition and Sexual Selection · doi:10.1016/b978-012100543-6/50027-1 · Cited by 2,074
The evolution of polyandry: multiple mating and female fitness in insects
Arnqvist, G., & Nilsson, T. (2000) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1446 · Cited by 1,545
Ejaculate Cost and Male Choice
Dewsbury, D. A. (1982) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283938 · Cited by 1,076
Sperm competition and ejaculate economics
Parker, G. A., & Pizzari, T. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00140.x · Cited by 619
A cost of mating in female fruitflies
Fowler, K., & Partridge, L. (1989) · Nature · doi:10.1038/338760a0 · Cited by 570
Metadata
- Authors
- Walker, W. F.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1980-06
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 780-799
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2011463910
- Cited by
- 442
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 24.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sperm Utilization Strategies in Nonsocial Insects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283600
- The paper
- Walker, W. F. (1980). Sperm Utilization Strategies in Nonsocial Insects. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283600
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.