Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems

Levin, Simon, Pimentel, David·1981·The American Naturalist

Abstract

On theoretical grounds, we argue that parasite-host systems are ideal candidates for interdemic or "group" selection because of the potential for selection for avirulence based upon reduced host (hence group) survival. Such selection appears to have been an important ingredient in the stabilization of the myxomatosis-rabbit system in Australia, although clearly the evolution of resistance in the rabbit population also played a part. We present a simple mathematical model to demonstrate how easily group selection can (in theory) stabilize a parasite-host system. This model is not meant to be a literal translation of the myxomatosis-rabbit interaction, and in fact intentionally disregards host evolution; its purpose is to isolate the role of group selection in the parasite population. Fenner has established that both interdemic selection and host evolution were important in the stabilization of that system, although our model demonstrates that in theory interdemic selection alone could stabilize the interaction. Our central point is that selection for avirulence in the parasite population is important in the evolution of stability in parasite-host systems (Fenner and Myers 1978). The obvious next step, both from the general theoretical viewpoint and specifically with regard to the myxoma-rabbit system, will be to consider models in which both host and parasite are permitted to coevolve. We feel, as do many others, that modeling of coevolution of parasite-host systems has not received the attention deserved in theoretical ecology, and that because of the interdependence of the elements these associations represent much better candidates for such theory than the more popular predator-prey or competition systems. Moreover, as Donald R. Strong, Jr., has pointed out to us, a broad range of organisms are functionally parasitic and the ideas that we have developed herein apply to these as well as to the more restricted class of species which are the conventional organisms treated in parasitology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1086/283708

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Levin, S., & Pimentel, D.
Venue
The American Naturalist
Published
1981-03
Volume
117
Issue
3
Pages
308-315
ISSN
  • 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-5323
OpenAlex
W1988240917
Cited by
490
References
1
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/283708
The paper
Levin, S., & Pimentel, D. (1981). Selection of Intermediate Rates of Increase in Parasite-Host Systems. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/283708

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.