The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nutrient Spiralling in Streams: Implications for Nutrient Limitation and Invertebrate Activity
Abstract
Nutrient cycling in streams occurs in conjunction with downstream transport as spatially distributed process that has been termed spiralling. The intensity of reutilization of nutrients as they pass downstream can be quantified in terms of the length of stream required for a nutrient atom to complete one (abstract) cycle; this distance is termed the spiralling length. Our model for steady-state spiralling of a limiting nutrient predicts that most of the downstream transport of nutrient occurs in particulate or unavailable form when nutrient limitation is severe; in this case, transportability of particulates is a major determinant of spiralling length. On the other hand, when nutrient limitation is moderated by density-dependent mechanisms, transport in the dissolved phase dominates, and transportability of particles has little influence on spiralling length. The potential role of invertebrate consumers in controlling spiralling was investigated by considering their influence on regeneration, transportability, and uptake of nutrients. Functional processes of grazing and filter feeding appear most likely to shorten spiralling length when nutrient limitation is severe, while the process of shredding is more likely to shorten spiralling length when nutrient limitation is weak. In some cases there may be levels of consumer activity at which spiralling length is minimized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vannote, R. L., Minshall, G. W., Cummins, K. W., Sedell, J. R., & Cushing, C. E. (1980) · Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1139/f80-017 · Cited by 9,984
Cited by
The Role of Macroinvertebrates in Stream Ecosystem Function
Wallace, J. B., & Webster, J. R. (1996) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.en.41.010196.000555 · Cited by 1,163
Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world
Malmqvist, B., & Rundle, S. (2002) · Environmental Conservation · doi:10.1017/s0376892902000097 · Cited by 1,047
State of science: mental workload in ergonomics
Young, M. S., Brookhuis, K. A., Wickens, C. D., & Hancock, P. A. (2015) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2014.956151 · Cited by 948
Understanding Processes and Downstream Linkages of Headwater Systems
GOMI, T., SIDLE, R. C., & RICHARDSON, J. S. (2002) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0905:upadlo]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 841
Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: a review
CLARKE, A., MAC NALLY, R., BOND, N., & LAKE, P. S. (2008) · Freshwater Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02041.x · Cited by 458
Metadata
- Authors
- Newbold, J. D., O'Neill, R. V., Elwood, J. W., & Van Winkle, W.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1982-11
- Volume
- 120
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 628-652
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2074337887
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nutrient Spiralling in Streams: Implications for Nutrient Limitation and Invertebrate Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284017
- The paper
- Newbold, J. D., O'Neill, R. V., Elwood, J. W., & Van Winkle, W. (1982). Nutrient Spiralling in Streams: Implications for Nutrient Limitation and Invertebrate Activity. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284017
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.