The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Evolution of Developmental Plasticity in Reproductive Characteristics: An Application of the "Adaptive Coin-Flipping" Principle
Abstract
Reproductive characteristics such as egg size and clutch size can be highly variable within populations of cold-blooded vertebrates. Such variation makes the idea of an optimal mean reproductive characteristic difficult to defend. Using a decision-theoretic approach and data from amphibians it is shown how the concepts of canalizing and decanalizing selection, which result, respectively, in a buffered or unbuffered developmental system, can be responsible for the maintenance of specific levels of intrapopulational variation. We distinguish different types of variation, such as intraclutch and interclutch variation in egg size. We review evidence which suggests that, as an adaptation to an unpredictable offspring environment, a single female may produce a seemingly maladaptive egg as a result of selection operating to maintain developmental plasticity in the vitellogenic process. We have called the developmental mechanisms which generate such seemingly stochastic variation "adaptive coin-flipping." The properties of the developmental "coin" (which can be two-sided or many-sided, fair or weighted) can evolve as a result of differences among individuals in sensitivities of vitellogenesis to environmental variation or as a result of individual differences in unresolvable developmental noise. Evidence is cited for the heritable nature of such variation in the properties of "coins" and the significance of a developmental "coin-flip" for ecological processes in general is discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
The Analysis of Variance and the Analysis of Causes.
Lewontin, R. C. (1974) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.10755182 · Cited by 581
Cited by
RISK-SPREADING AND BET-HEDGING IN INSECT POPULATION BIOLOGY
Hopper, K. R. (1999) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ento.44.1.535 · Cited by 470
Evolutionary ecology of facultative paedomorphosis in newts and salamanders
Denoël, M., Joly, P., & Whiteman, H. H. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006858 · Cited by 148
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, R. H., & Cooper, W. S.
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1984-03
- Volume
- 123
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 393-410
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2019962508
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Evolution of Developmental Plasticity in Reproductive Characteristics: An Application of the "Adaptive Coin-Flipping" Principle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1086/284211
- The paper
- Kaplan, R. H., & Cooper, W. S. (1984). The Evolution of Developmental Plasticity in Reproductive Characteristics: An Application of the "Adaptive Coin-Flipping" Principle. The American Naturalist. https://doi.org/10.1086/284211
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.