The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Abstract
Comparative studies of the relationship between two phenotypes, or between a phenotype and an environment, are frequently carried out by invalid statistical methods. Most regression, correlation, and contingency table methods, including nonparametric methods, assume that the points are drawn independently from a common distribution. When species are taken from a branching phylogeny, they are manifestly nonindependent. Use of a statistical method that assumes independence will cause overstatement of the significance in hypothesis tests. Some illustrative examples of these phenomena have been given, and limitations of previous proposals of ways to correct for the nonindependence have been discussed. A method of correcting for the phylogeny has been proposed. It requires that we know both the tree topology and the branch lengths, and that we be willing to allow the characters to be modeled by Brownian motion on a linear scale. Given these conditions, the phylogeny specifies a set of contrasts among species, contrasts that are statistically independent and can be used in regression or correlation studies. The considerable barriers to making practical use of this technique have been discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“We calculated standardized independent contrasts (FIC: Felsenstein 1985) for each of the above factors (territoriality, shoulder height, body mass, habitat openness and group size) using the PDTREE module (Midford et al. 2005) in Mesquite 2.5 (Maddison & Maddison 2008) to account for shared ancestry.”
From Evolution of weaponry in female bovids (2009) · cites this paper as Felsenstein 1985
In the citing paper
“To test the effects of shared ancestry on trait correlations, we also carried out EMMLi analysis on the phylogenetic independent contrasts (45) of the landmark configurations. This analysis supported the same most likely model and relative strength of correlations within and among modules as the analysis of the raw data did.”
From Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium (2018) · cites this paper as [45]
In the citing paper
“Firstly, because of shared phylogenetic descent, species data are likely not to represent statistically independent points.This results in overestimation of degrees of freedom and an increased Type I error rate.”
From Allometric scaling of mammalian metabolism (2005) · cites this paper as Felsenstein, 1985
In the citing paper
“Felsenstein also noted that the problem of nonindependence does not occur if”
From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Felsenstein 1985
In the citing paper
“He then evolved traits according to a BM process along the phylogeny; he recovered a significant regression slope using Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) despite there being no evolutionary covariance between the traits.”
From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Felsenstein 1985
In the citing paper
“As stated above, the IC method is based on the BM model of trait evolution.”
From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Felsenstein 1985
In the citing paper
“This led to the development of numerous methods that take phylogeny into account and control for the non-independence of species16,18,19,33.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The fact that species cannot be considered independent data points was first recognized in the 1970s by evolutionary biologists studying the evolution of life history traits such as sexual dimorphism and home range in primates16,18,30–32.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“However, species, genomes and genes cannot be considered as independent data points within statistical tests.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Closely related species tend to be similar because they share genes by common descent, which must be accounted for in analyses.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“There is no simple and robust alternative to controlling for phylogeny, and consequently, the best effort possible must be made to take phylogeny into account, to be able to detect real effects and avoid false positives.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Collecting many more data points from the same phylogenetic cluster could increase any bias due to phylogenetic non-independence (Fig. 1)16,18,20.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Instead, controlling for phylogeny can reduce the chance of detecting a significant result that is not real (Type II error or ‘false positive’)18,42.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Controlling for confounding variables such as phylogeny does not reduce statistical power, because such variables should be accounted for before making any estimates of power18,114,115.”
From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Phylogenetic independent contrasts were also calculated from the data to examine scaling relationships while controlling for the effects of phylogenetic relatedness in the data set (59).”
From Evolution of increased glia–neuron ratios in the human frontal cortex (2006) · cites this paper as [59]
In the citing paper
“With a phylogeny, it becomes possible to examine correlated evolutionary change directly along the branches of the tree, for example with the method of independent contrasts (Felsenstein 1985; Garland et al. 1992; Nunn and Barton 2001). Alternatively, one can use the phylogeny to statistically control for nonindependence in the underlying data, for example by using phylogenetic generalized least”
From How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology (2012) · cites this paper as Felsenstein 1985
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Self-citationCases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively Misleading
Felsenstein, J. (1978) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/27.4.401 · Cited by 3,261
Self-citationPopulation density and body size in mammals
Damuth, J. D. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/290699a0 · Cited by 1,189
Primate Ecology and Social Organization
Richard, A. F. (1982) · Cited by 835
Relative brain size and basal metabolic rate in terrestrial vertebrates
Martin, R. D. (1981) · Nature · doi:10.1038/293057a0 · Cited by 711
Maximum-likelihood estimation of evolutionary trees from continuous characters.
(1973) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 700
Self-citationFelsenstein, J. (1981) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04991.x · Cited by 456
Self-citationPilbeam, D., & Gould, S. J. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.186.4167.892 · Cited by 416
Parsimony in Systematics: Biological and Statistical Issues
Felsenstein, J. (1983) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.es.14.110183.001525 · Cited by 352
Self-citationRelative Brain Size and Metabolism in Mammals
Armstrong, E. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6407108 · Cited by 252
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 8,901–9,000 of 9,780
Contribution of the parent plant to dispersal
Cousens, R. D., Dytham, C., & Law, R. (2008) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299126.003.0002
Bradshaw, D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840906.013
Climatic niches in phylogenetic comparative studies: a review of challenges and approachesPreprint
Budic, L., & Dormann, C. F. (2015) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/018796 · Cited by 8
Determination of plasma urea nitrogen
Bradshaw, D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840906.014
The thesis applied to parasitoids, plants, and vertebrate taxa
Price, P. W. (2002) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511615030.010
Turnover methodology: theory and practice
Bradshaw, D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840906.005
Comparison of phylogenetic methods and tests on trees
Yang, Z. (2014) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199602605.003.0005
evolution: An example using yeast functional genomic data
Oakley, T. H., Gu, Z., Abouheif, E., Patel, N. H., & Wen-Hsiung (2004)
Gibson, D. J. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671465.003.0002
Planning, choosing, and using statistics
Gibson, D. J. (2014) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671465.003.0007
Molecular clock and estimation of species divergence times
Yang, Z. (2006) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198567028.003.0007
Torpor and hibernation in cold climates
Bradshaw, D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840906.008
Case studies of stress: incidence and intensity
Bradshaw, D. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840906.006
Holt, A. R., & Gaston, K. J. (2003)
Synthesis Macrophysiology: A Conceptual Reunification
Gaston, K. J., Chown, S. L., Calosi, P., Bernardo, J., Bilton, D. T., Clarke, A., Clusella‐Trullas, S., Ghalambor, C. K., Konarzewski, M., Peck, L. S., et al. (2009)
Yamada, T., Ngakan, P. O., & Suzuki, E. (2005)
Okay, S. (2016) · Turkish Journal of Biochemistry · doi:10.1515/tjb-2016-0019
Ecologia trófica de anfíbios anuros: relações filogenéticas em diferentes escalas
Amado, T. F. (2014) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Keil, P., Bennett, J. M., Burgeois, B., García‐Peña, G. E., MacDonald, A. A. M., Meyer, C., Ramirez, K. S., & Yguel, B. (2016) · doi:10.7287/peerj.preprints.2367v1
Thermal adaptation of the phage G4 and molecular evolution of RNA secondary structure
Knies, J. L. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/2npx-3396
Kotsakiozi, P., Parmakelis, Α., Konstantakis, A., & Valakos, E. D. (2016) · Biologia · doi:10.1515/biolog-2016-0114
Foraging behavior, behavioral flexibility, and range size of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae)
Wagner, S. K. (2015) · CU Scholar (University of Colorado Boulder)
SYNTHESIS A global analysis of trait variation and evolution in climbing plants
Gallagher, R. V., & Leishman, M. R. (2012)
Rapid Floral and Pitcher Scent Diversification in Carnivorous Pitcher Plants (Sarraceniaceae)Preprint
Ho, W. W., Kutz, J. N., Ng, J., & Riffell, J. A. (2016) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/079947
Chithambaram, S. (2014) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-3483
Ecological correlates of single-seededness in a
Casper, B. B., Heard, S. B., & Apanius, V. (1992)
ARTHROPOD FORAGING BY A SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA
Guild, H., Powers, D. R., Hook, Y. A. V., Sandlin, E. A., & McWhorter, T. J. (2010)
The Roles of Stop Codons and 3’ Flanking Base in Bacterial Translation Termination Efficiency
Wei, Y. (2016) · uO Research (University of Ottawa) · doi:10.20381/ruor-487
Investigating the Evolutionary Forces Acting on Mammalian Transcription Factor Binding
Douglas, G. M. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Functional and floristic dynamics of Amazonian forests
Esquivel‐Muelbert, A. (2016) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Martins, E. P. (1992) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/s0003-3472(05)80337-9
Form and function of the craniomandibular complex in subterranean rodents
McIntosh, A. F. (2016) · Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull)
Chapter 12 Evolutionary conservation biology
Henkanaththegedara, S. M., & Stockwell, C. A. (2011)
A critical comment on the ‘multiple variance Brownian motion’ model of Smaers et al. (2016)
Griffin, R. H., & Yapuncich, G. (2017) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blw030
The evolution and design of the locomotor system in lizards of the southwest United States
Scales, J. A. (2014) · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Uncovering the drivers of host-associated microbiota with joint species distribution modelingPreprint
Björk, J. R., Hui, F. K. C., O’Hara, R. B., & Montoya, J. M. (2017) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/137943
Defesas contra herbivoria no cerrado: síndromes de defesa e originalidades
da Silva, D. M. (2010) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Temperature acclimation in dragonfly larvae: which species are more vulnerable to global warming?
Karlsson, E. A. (2017) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology)
The relationship between population size and rates of language evolution
Welsh, C. F. (2016) · ANU Undergraduate Research Journal · doi:10.22459/aurj.07.2015.03
Valadas, S. Y. O. B. (2016) · doi:10.11606/t.10.2016.tde-14082015-170043
Functional Trade-offs in Feeding Performance in Salamanders of the Family Salamandridae
Stinson, C. M. (2017) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Structure and Preservation of Chiton Valves: Resolution of a Taphonomic Quandary
Peebles, B. A. (2017) · Otago University Research Archive (University of Otago)
Correlated Evolution of Teleost Fish Rhodopsin with Habitat: Linking Molecular Changes to Ecology
Sabouhanian, A. (2015) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Report Social Group Size Predicts the Evolution of Individuality
Pollard, K. A., & Blumstein, D. T. (2011)
Phylogenetic Community Structure Of Aquatic Beetle Assemblages In A Multi-wetland Experiment
Kelly, S. L. (2012) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Veneziano, A. (2017) · Liverpool John Moores University · doi:10.24377/ljmu.t.00007451
Is the blunderbuss a misleading visual metaphor for stasis and punctuated evolution?Preprint
Waller, J. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/242297
Modeling Trait Evolutionary Processes with More Than One Gene
Jiang, H. (2017) · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Pérez‐Claros, J. A., Serra, A. M., Figueirido, B., Janis, C. M., & Palmqvist, P. (2013) · Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Málaga (University of Málaga)
Assembly Rules of the Microbiome
Levy, R. (2015) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Phylogenetic Comparative Methods and Tests of Macroevolutionary Questions
Martins, E. P., & Fuentes-González, J. A. (2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199941728-0099
Hummingbird Hovering Energetics and Flight Capacities Across Elevational Gradients
Groom, D. J. E. (2017) · TSpace (University of Toronto)
Haemosporidian Parasites and Host Immune Function of Galapagos Avifauna
Jaramillo, M. (2018) · IRL - University of Missouri, St. Louis (University of Missouri–St. Louis)
Diversidad morfológica mandibular de los monos capuchinos: un análisis morfométrico
Rı́o, J. D., dos Reis, S. F., dos Santos, T. M. P., Lopes, R. T., & Pérez, S. I. (2018) · Revista Argentina de Antropología Biológica · doi:10.17139/raab.2018.0020.02.07
Superson, A. A., Phelan, D., Dekovich, A., & Battistuzzi, F. (2018) · bioRxiv · doi:10.1101/369264
Computational Approach to Study Ecophysiology
Barik, B. P., & Mishra, A. N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-93233-0_28
Detecting mosaic patterns in macroevolutionary disparityPreprint
Parins-Fukuchi, C. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/423228
Madsen‐McQueen, T. (2018) · NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro) · doi:10.71889/5fylantbak.29863241
Analysing Phylogenetic Structures
Thioulouse, J., Dray, S., Dufour, A., Siberchicot, A., Jombart, T., & Pavoine, S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-8850-1_13
Ortiz, J. F., & Rokas, A. (2018) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/504498
Maraschi, A. C. (2018) · Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (Universidade de São Paulo) · doi:10.11606/t.59.2018.tde-03092018-133340
Mapping mutations on phylogenies
Nielsen, R. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Genetics, Genomics, Proteomics and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/047001153x.g404309
18. Environmental Predictability and Life History
Low, B. S., & Braude, S. H. (2010) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400835454-023
Ho, L. S. T., Dinh, V., Matsen, F. A., IV, & Suchard, M. A. (2019) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/s00285-019-01453-1
Hedrick, B. P., Cordero, S. A., Zanno, L. E., Noto, C. R., & Dodson, P. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/593236
Lee, M. B. (2018) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Sağlam, İ. K., Miller, M. R., O’Rourke, S., & Çağlar, S. S. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/610857
Nielsen, R. (2018) · Carroll Collected (John Carroll University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Felsenstein, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Felsenstein, Joseph
- Venue
- The American Naturalist
- Publisher
- University of Chicago Press
- Published
- 1985-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-15
- ISSN
- 0003-0147 (ISSN-L)
- 1537-5323
- OpenAlex
- W2013410948
- Cited by
- 9,793
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 242 · 2025: 311 · 2024: 287 · 2023: 361 · 2022: 335 · 2021: 391 · 2020: 332 · 2019: 465 · 2018: 375 · 2017: 374 · 2016: 374 · 2015: 399 · 2014: 436 · 2013: 342 · 2012: 343
- FWCI
- 40.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The American Naturalist (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- University of Washington
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- phylogenetic comparative analysis, Brownian motion model, branch length, tree topology, contingency tables, character evolution
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
